Bush administration classified photos showing glacier retreat

i-5df6c7dc7445be0a2bce7c23230a695b-shrinkingice.jpg
The Bush administration classified various spy photos of glaciers. It isn't clear why. Those glaciers are no imminent danger to us, and are unlikely to learn anything useful about the sources and methods we use to monitor them even with the photos. That we take pictures of glaciers is hardly shocking news to our enemies.

Then again, the photos show dramatically different extent of sea ice and mountain glaciers, even from one year to the next. Responding to a request for declassification from the National Academy of Sciences, the Obama administration released the photos. Already various observers are using them to push for faster action on climate change, and to beat up on the secrecy of the Bush administration.

The photo above shows the Chukchi Sea, near Barrow, AK. In July 2006, it was covered in sea ice. One year later, July 2007, shows no sea ice in the same area. Needless to say, it's a worrying trend, and rather puts George Will's persistent crankery in context.

More like this

In 2007, the Arctic saw its lowest levels of sea ice coverage than any year in recorded history, and trends for 2009 indicate that we may be on our way to a new record low. The low summer coverage follows a winter that saw an unprecedented disappearance of thick, multiyear ice, which is more…
"Everybody knows that the dice are loaded Everybody rolls with their fingers crossed Everybody knows that the war is over Everybody knows the good guys lost Everybody knows the fight was fixed The poor stay poor, the rich get rich That's how it goes; everybody knows." -Leonard Cohen As you know,…
Someone refererred be to As Effects of Warming Grow, U.N. Report is Quickly Dated . It's yet another piece of the std.nonsense that one swallow does a summer make, and anyone who feels like quoting the odd warming factoid can throw away the IPCC, whilst of course sneering at the people who say it…
August sea ice extent in the Arctic this year was 640,000 square kilometers below the previous record set in 2007.  It is also already a record monthly low for any month, though that record will not last as it is going to be broken this September when the lowest extent of the year is normally…

Isn't calling a one-year variance without historical context "a trend" a Patented GW denialism move?

Good point. The photographs illustrate a long-term trend, and that long-term warming trend is what's worrisome, not the annual variation. I should have been clearer on that point.

I rather hope that someone puts together pictures from across a reasonably long timespan -- at least a decade, preferably several -- into a Flash animation. One picture, words, many pictures: word.

By D. C. Sessions (not verified) on 28 Jul 2009 #permalink

2nd that there D.C. - the science is confusing, lets face it. pictures (with a robust assertion of validity) are uber powerful.

If it's not a problem, why go to such lengths to hide it?

Glaciers melting? But of course. That's becuase of the NATURAL, not man-made climate cycle of the earth that has been going on since the continents started drifting apart after the flood of Noah.

Guess what. Glaciers will come back one day. Then they will melt again. Then they will come back. Then they will melt again. Then they will come back. Then they will melt again.Then they will come back. Then they will melt again.Then they will come back. Then they will melt again.Then they will come back. Then they will melt again.Then they will come back. Then they will melt again.Then they will come back. Then they will melt again.

Get the trend? Global warming is a farce and a scam. Stupid people actually believe this dictatorial propaganda crap and expect me to contribute to their high cause of nature worship. My contribution is simply this: Go to hell and take your CFL bulbs and shove them up your fascist ass and mind your own business.

Idiots.

By Fecal Appariti… (not verified) on 06 Aug 2009 #permalink