Kevin Drum meditates on the conservative movement hating on vegetables:
A first lady campaigning against obesity and in favor of breast feeding is now the target of all-out war from the right. I imagine that if she were taking on illiteracy, teenage drug use, or planting flowers, the Republican Party would suddenly find itself opposed to reading, defending Mexican drug cartels, and in favor of vacant lots. And yet we're supposed to take these people seriously.
No. We're not, and we shouldn't.
- Log in to post comments
More like this
I've expounded on the principle of crank magnetism. Basically, crank magnetism is the tendency of cranks not to mind the crankery of other cranks, even if the two forms of crankery are mutually exclusive. But it's more than that. It's the tendency of a single crank to be attracted to several forms…
We're now seeing all of the civility trolls coming out of the woodwork. If by civility, one means "not engaging in violent eliminationist rhetoric", well, then I'm all for it. But what I'm concerned about is that honest criticism will be silenced. While I'm not as sanguine about political…
There has been a little brouhaha started between a couple of the Volokh contributors and Stephen Bainbridge, a battle between the social conservative Bainbridge and the more libertarian-minded David Bernstein and Randy Barnett. It began with Bernstein posting a quote from an article for which he…
Some guy named Gerard Alexander has an opinion piece in the Washington Post titled "Why are liberals so condescending?" I will say one thing in its favor: it gets to its point quickly and clearly in the first few sentences.
Every political community includes some members who insist that their side…
Planting flowers obviously marks you as a dirty hippy.
Republicans, if given druthers,
Would put a ban on nursing mothers;
Despite what doctors say is best,
The GOP canât stand a breast.
They cannot see a lot thatâs worse
Than letting mom and baby nurse
Theyâd legislate against their mamas
Before theyâd side with the Obamas
Liberals attacked Nancy Reagan for telling children not to smoke crack. So it go...
To be fair, we attacked her for reducing all of the nation's drug abuse issues into condescendingly telling teenagers to "Just say no." I was a kid back then, and I found it fucking insulting. More to the point, I knew that it wasn't meant for me, but for the adults. One of the great failures of policy is that there has never BEEN any drug policy that was more than simple theater.
Just say no...to hamburgers.
While I've little doubt that most Republicans would only criticise Obama out of tribalism there's nowt wrong with picking beefs with a campaign, however noble its intent might seem. (Say, for example, that I launched a campaign to stop children being disappointed on Christmas. Nobody could fault its goal but if I was pursuing it by rushing into houses dressed as Santa Claus, distributing whatever gifts I'd stolen, people might not be uproarious in their acclaim.) So, while I'm all for good ideas on how to stop obesity I don't think FLMO has them: the notion that it's a concern of national security, for example, is absurd and faintly noxious.
On the other hand, I like the criticism that she's been "incredibly insulting to parents". X is crossing a road in the path of an oncoming car. Y informs him of the urgent risks that such an action poses. "Why, how incredibly insulting!" X protests, before being sprayed across the road like a tomato off a baseball bat. Something can be condescending, patronising or insulting but that needn't mean it's incorrect.