Astroturfing to Protect Astroturf

By Liz Borkowski 

Thereâs an article making its way around the internet warning that a lobbying reform law currently in the Senate will require bloggers who criticize Congress and reach audiences of more than 500 to register and file quarterly reports with Congress -- or risk jail time.

Mike Dunford of The Questionable Authority decided to investigate this, and found no such provision in the bill. In fact, he cites passages of the bill stating that it covers paid attempts to stir up the public on behalf of a client. Sums above $25,000 also need to be involved. In fact, this piece of the legislation seems specifically designed to crack down on astroturfing, a tactic that industry PR firms use to manufacture grassroots support for their positions.

In astroturfing, an industry funds the creation of a group that appears to be grassroots in nature and that argues the industryâs position (though its arguments will tend to focus on things like freedom and âstopping big governmentâ and avoid mentioning industry).  Here's how SourceWatch explains it:

Unlike genuine grassroots activism which tends to be money-poor but people-rich, astroturf campaigns are typically people-poor but cash-rich. Funded heavily by corporate largesse, they use sophisticated computer databases, telephone banks and hired organizers to rope less-informed activists into sending letters to their elected officials or engaging in other actions that create the appearance of grassroots support for their client's cause.
[â¦]
Astroturf techniques have been used to:
â¢Â block the transfer of federal licenses that WorldCom uses for its long distance and Internet services by Issue Dynamics Inc. using non-profit groups like the United Church of Christ
â¢Â defeat the Clinton administration's proposed health care reform, through a front group called "Rx Partners" created by the Beckel Cowan PR firm, and the Coalition for Health Insurance Choices, created by public relations consultant Blair Childs
â¢Â harass environmentalists through the Wise Use movement
â¢Â loosen automobile fuel efficience standards
â¢Â support clear-cutting American forests, through a front group called Citizens to Protect the Pacific Northwest and Northern California Economy
â¢Â oppose restrictions on smoking in public places, through a front group called National Smokers Alliance, which was created by Burson-Marsteller
â¢Â generate a dossier of newsclips orchestrated by Edelman to assist Microsoft lobbyists persuade U.S. state attorney generals not to join a class action against the company.
â¢Â Encourage people to buy Coke

After Mike concluded that the legislation was targeted at astroturfing and wasnât likely to affect bloggers, he turned to investigating the source of the press release that stirred up the concern in the first place:

Now let's look more closely at the press release that's caused all of the fuss. It was issued by a "grassroots organization" called GrassrootsFreedom.com. This organization has, in the 14 days since the bill was introduced, been started up, got the website up, got the email notification list up, got at least the one press release out, and apparently had a press conference scheduled at one point in time. Suspicious yet?

If you are, good, because the suspicions certainly appear to be pretty valid. The founder of GrassrootsFreedom is Richard A. Viguerie. Mr. Viguerie is a long-time conservative activist who - wait for it - "pioneered political use of computerized mass mail," and has raised funds for a long list of conservative causes during his long career.

That's right. It looks like the alarmist (and dishonest) "Congress is going to lock up bloggers" press release was written by an astroturf group, in an attempt to influence bloggers to oppose (at the grassroots level) a piece of legislation designed to make it harder to use astroturf groups to influence legislation.

Gotta love it.

For more examples of astroturfing, check out Paul Thackerâs article âHidden Ties,â which chronicles the work of Project Protect and Save our Species Alliance on the Healthy Forests Initiative and Endangered Species Act.

Tags

More like this

Via Bora, I found a somewhat alarming article. Apparently, it's being claimed, the Lobbying reform law currently in the senate will require bloggers (among other people) to register and file quarterly reports with congress or face possible jail time, "the same as the big K Street lobbyists."…
Earlier today, I got an email from a gentlemanlawyer named Mark Fitzgibbons. Mr. Fitzgibbons had apparently just read one of my posts about the "astroturf lobbying" bill. (It's encouraging to note that Mr. Fitzgibbons, who claims to be very concerned with the effect of this legislation on blogging…
In a post earlier today, I discussed a case where an astroturf group is attempting to stir up popular objection to a clause in a bill before the Senate that mandates disclosure of this type of lobbying activity. In a comment to a post over at Bora's blog, MattXIV raises a point that requires a more…
Criticize Congress go to jail? "In what sounds like a comedy sketch from Jon Stewart's Daily Show, but isn't, the U. S. Senate would impose criminal penalties, even jail time, on grassroots causes and citizens who criticize Congress. "Section 220 of S. 1, the lobbying reform bill currently before…

Will the madness ever end? Will it take the Big Bomb before we realize we are doing it all wrong and need to start over? I am overwhelmed at this point.