Latest Toy Hazard: Asbestos

The Asbestos Disease Awareness Organization, a group created by asbestos victims and their families, bought products from national retailers and had them tested at independent labs. One of the most disturbing findings was high levels of asbestos in powder from a toy CSI fingerprint kit. The powder is intended to be sprinkled on surfaces and brushed with a soft-bristle brush â creating conditions ripe for inhalation.

Andrew Schneider reports on the groupâs findings in the Seattle P-I, and notes that CBS, which licenses the kit, has asked its licensees to have the kits tested immediately and to remove the toy from the market if itâs found to be unsafe.

Why is a small organization â which spent more than $165,000 getting products tested at government-certified labs â taking on the job of policing consumer products? Schneider explains:

"We had to. No one else was doing it," said Linda Reinstein, the group's co-founder and executive director. "This is information that consumers and Congress must have because asbestos is lethal and we naively believe that the government is protecting us, when it's not."

[â¦]

After reporting its findings at a news conference in Washington on Wednesday morning, the organization says it will submit its testing information to the Consumer Product Safety Commission and the EPA.
"The government really needs to act responsibly and honestly and understand that political compromises have no meaning to a family devastated by an asbestos cancer," Harbut said.

The Asbestos Disease Awareness Organization's Reinstein says, "The government has to do its job."

"There is no reason at all for the American consumer to pull a product off the market shelf and wonder whether it has asbestos in it that can kill them or their family. Just no reason at all," Reinstein said. Her husband, Alan, died of mesothelioma last year.

The ADAO isnât the only group taking matters into its own hands. Recently, the Center for Environmental Health and U.S. Public Interest Research Group conducted tests on dozens of toys and reported that several had high lead levels. In some cases, such efforts have prompted responses from the retailers, manufacturers, and/or licensing companies associated with tainted toys. The groupsâ success, though, relies largely on their ability to attract media attention, and at some point reporters and editors may decide theyâve had enough stories about tainted toys. (Itâs not just toys, of course: ADAO found several home-improvement products that came up with worrisome asbestos levels.)

In this enormously wealthy country, we shouldnât have to rely on a handful of nonprofit groups to ensure the safety of the products we buy. We should have a strong, well-funded Consumer Product Safety Commission. Until we do, weâll have to be cautious about what we buy and grateful to advocacy groups for filling in some of the gaps.