Banning the Bag

In San Francisco, large grocery stores are no longer allowed to give out the disposable, non-biodegradable plastic bags that have formed a giant patch of plastic (twice the size of Texas) in the Pacific Ocean and caused a host of other problems. The Whole Foods supermarket chain will halt plastic-bag distribution on Earth Day this year, and China's ban on plastic bags will take effect on June 1.

In light of China's actions, the Guardian looked at other countries that have taken steps to ban or limit the distribution of plastic bags:

At least 40 countries, states and major cities have imposed, or are considering, bans. According to the UN environment programme based in Nairobi, the plastic problem is now "on the agenda of almost every African country". Rwanda and Eritrea have banned the bags outright; Tanzania has stopped all imports as well as the manufacture of bags, and flimsy plastic drinking water containers; Kenya is in the process of prohibiting them and South Africa, which once produced 7bn bags a year, has prohibited bags thinner than 30 microns (one micron is one-thousandth of a millimetre). In many cases the bans have not proved effective. A ban on the use of thin plastic bags in Uganda has been widely ignored.The growing global rejection of the bag is now reaching some of the remotest parts of the world. Papua New Guinea, Bhutan, Zanzibar and Botswana have all banned bags and introduced taxes. At least six Indian states, including Maharashtra and Himachal Pradesh, have bans or are considering them.

Densely populated Taiwan, which is running out of landfill space, has not only banned bags but has stopped fast food restaurants and supermarkets issuing plastic knives, forks and cups. The local plastics industry, which has been producing 20bn bags a year, says it expects to see 50,000 jobs lost.

Attitudes are now changing fast in industrialised countries. Ireland took the lead in Europe in 2002 with a tax, Australia is planning to impose a federal ban this year, and San Francisco and Oakland in California are forcing shops to use bags made of at least 40% high-grade recycled paper. This week New York passed a law forcing large stores to provide bins for recycling plastic bags. Meanwhile the 33 London councils are planning to introduce a law banning the ultra thin, single-use bags next year and imposing a tax on others.

It will be a long time before we clear plastic bags out of the waterways, tree limbs, and other parts of the landscape where they've become ubiquitous -- and hundreds of years before the millions of bags clogging landfills degrade. Decreasing the rate at which we use this unnecessary item will slow the rate at which the problem gets worse.

Enforcement problems are to be expected, but each jurisdiction that bans bags reminds its residents that there's no reason to expect that every purchase come with a disposable bag -- especially when the environmental cost of the habit is so high.

Categories

More like this

Watch for more of this kind of stuff as green prducts and technologies grow! And along the same vein, did anyone else note that Saudia Arabia brought up the idea of their being entitled to compensation for lost revenue in any kind of a global oil consumption control agreement? I think this came up…
Plastic bags have some desirable traits. They require less energy and water to make than paper bags. Their impermeability means that they won't become a gooey, soggy mess over a little rotten egg. But the very thing that makes plastic bags so attractive must also make them an environmental…
CNN as an interesting article on plastic. We now consume around 100 million tons of plastic annually, compared to five million tons in the 1950s when American housewives were just discovering the wonders of Tupperware. To put that into perspective, one ton of plastic represents around 20,000 two-…
Last weekend I did the beach clean-up thing again, and again I went along with my son, my mum (Sandra), and about 40 other people. There's always something new to say about the problem of litter and plastic pollution: once again, I thought I'd pen some random musings on the experience, and on the…

The general public for years was told to use plastc as it was biodegradble and paper bags was bad because of trees lost. Now we are hearing that these bags are not so biodegradable and paper is better. Personally I try not to use either as I have bought reusable material bags that I take to the store and and bring home my groceries and now even department stores purchases home in. I guess this is catching on as the other day I had one of my material bags stollen right out of my cart. It seems to be the best answer...now the only down side is sometimes I have forgotten to take my own bags with me so... now I keep them in the car. They used to cost 99cents now the store want up to $3 for them. I guess that's why someone stole mine. I think the stores would be better to keep the price low so people will buy them and use them and this would allow the stores to save money in the long run as they could stop purchasing those plastic and paper bags. Now we just have to be sure the material that the permanent bags are made from are made with earth friendly materials. So much to get the general public to do and so little time. well, at least it is a start.

By Catherine St.Onge (not verified) on 31 Jan 2008 #permalink

Whole Foods evidently had a hard time getting people to bring reusable bags until they started selling them for 99 cents. It looks like some of the big grocery store chains have started doing the same -- I've seen a lot of reusable Giant and Safeway bags in my neighborhood. I think part of the appeal is that they're a good size and shape for carrying groceries.