Yes, they are a discount house

At a recent Senate hearing, former OSHA Assistant Secretary Jerry Scannell (1989-1993) described the pressure he often felt, especially from lawyers inside and outside the agency, to settle inspection and fatality-investigation cases by using âdiscount factorsâ to reduce monetary penalties.  He recalled wondering, âWhat are we, a discount house?â   Reporter Andy Pierrotti with WSPA-TV (Spartanburg/Greenville, SC) has found exactly the same "discount house" mentality through his investigation of SC-OSHA.  His story is entitled "Discounted Lives."

Pierrotti assembled record from the last four years to demonstrate how SC-OSHA, reduce assessed penalties in order to settle cases against the employers responsible for the workers' deaths.  He also relays the shock of family members after learning how already nominal fines become meaningless through the settlement process.

The monetary penalty assessed against 22-year old Travis Wood's employer was reduced from $15,225 to $2,700.  The young Mr. Wood died in April 2007 from a 31-foot fall at Automated Distribution Center in Gaffney, SC.

Mrs. Carma Magnani's husband Ronald, 59, was severely injured at work and later died at the hospital.  His employer, Cryovac, was initially fined $3,500 which was reduced to $1,500.

The WSPA reporter Pierrotti found examples of penalty reductions even for companies with repeat injuries and violations.

Our investigation also found reduced fines involving companies with repeat accidents or violations, like the Michelin plant in Sandy Springs. In 2006, one person died from burns involving an exposed water pipe. A few months later, another Michelin worker's arm, crushed and then amputated, after getting caught in a machine.  While both accidents involved clear safety violations, both fines: significantly cut through settlement agreements.

Pierrotti's assessment "Discounted Lives" is a MUST read.

More like this

This was one of the first-class quotes from former OSHA Assistant Secretary Jerry Scannell (1989-1993) during today's hearing on workers' safety and health before the Senate HELP Subcommittee on Employment and Workplace Safety.  His comment came in response to discussions about OSHA's and the…
While we're on vacation, we're re-posting content from earlier in the year. This post was originally published on February 28, 2011. By Celeste Monforton Roxanne Moyer wondered why managers at her husband's worksite would allow an obvious dangerous condition to exist. Workers could be so "close to…
Roxanne Moyer wondered why managers at her husband's worksite would allow an obvious dangerous condition to exist. Workers could be so "close to molten steel [that it] just poured over on them." Her husband, Samuel Moyer, 32 died earlier this month at Arcelor Mittal's LaPlace, Lousiania steel…
With the six-month deadline approaching for issuing citations and monetary penalties, OSHA announced today 13 willful and 25 serious violations against RPI Coatings, the employer of five workers who died in early October at the Excel Energy Cabin Creek Station hydroelectric plant near Georgetown…

While at the UAW, I often told OSHA and MiOSHA that I'd rather see no fine at all after a fatality than the penalty dollars imposed.

Nevertheless, the excuse to settle short is written into the OSHA law. An employer who contests a citation is exempt from further enforcement of that standard for the duration of the contest. The employer may do nothing at all to abate the violation.

By Frank Mirer (not verified) on 21 May 2008 #permalink