1. thepumphandle
  2. Justice Sandra Day O'Connor hears OSHA's Chromium Case

Justice Sandra Day O'Connor hears OSHA's Chromium Case

By sb admin on November 21, 2008.

A three-judge panel of the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals will hear oral arguments today about OSHA's rule on hexavalent chromium.  OSHA issued the rule in February 2006, after this same Court of Appeals instructed the Agency in December 2002 to do so.  (According to Law.com, the attorneys for the parties learned only two weeks ago that Justice O'Connor would be on the panel.)

Public Citizen and the United Steelworkers petitioned the court for a review of OSHA's 2006 final rule, arguing that the 5 ug/m3 PEL does not protect workers' health.  Hexavalent chromium is a known human carcinogen.  OSHA's risk assessment indicated that even at a 1.0 ug/m3 exposure limit (over a working lifetime), as many as 9 out of 1,000 workers would develop lung cancer.  Attorneys for Labor Secretary Chao, joined by the National Association of Manufacturers, Specialty Steel Industry, Portland Cement Association, and other industry groups, assert that the exposure limit set by OSHA is feasible, and anything stricter than that would....would... cost them too much money not be feasible. 

After the oral arguments, the three judge panel may take a couple of months to write their opinion.

P.S. While lawyers for the Portland Cement Association are right in the mix defending this inadequate OSHA standard on hexavalent chromium, their colleagues were signing an alliance agreement with MSHA , trying to show their commitment to workers' health and safety.  Just DON'T make them comply, by golly, with any strict hexavalent chromium exposure limits.

Tags
Occupational Health & Safety

More like this

Court Defers to OSHA on HexChrome Rule
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit issued a decision this week on legal challenges to OSHA's 2006 rule to protect workers from exposure to hexavalent chromium.  In the simpliest terms, Public Citizen's Health Research Group and the Steelworkers argued that OSHA's rule was not…
3rd Circuit judges laud workers' right-to-know
In late November, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit heard oral arguments on the two petitions for review of OSHA's health standard on hexavalent chromium (CrVI).   The transcript of the proceeding (52-page PDF) reveal that these judges did their homework.…
Judges See Through Industryâs Diesel Exhaust
The US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit ruled today in favor of the United Steelworkers and MSHA in their efforts to protect underground miners from diesel particulate matter (DPM).  The mining industry plaintiffs have claimed for years that MSHAâs 2001 DPM health standard was neither…
Dog Tails, Canaries and a Diesel Ruleâs âIllegitimate Birthâ
Mining companies opposed to a health standard to protect underground miners from diesel particulate matter (DPM) finally had their day in court.  The morning proceeding featured remarks about tail-wagging dogs and coal-mine canaries, presented before a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of…