EPA Medical Waste Rule Helps Clear the Air

Itâs nice to finally be able to report that the Bush administration EPA has issued what appears to be a strong pollution-curbing rule on medical waste incineration. Although medical waste incinerators account for a relatively small amount of overall air pollution, they can have significant effects in the 57 communities where theyâre currently located.

EPA estimates that if incinerators meet the new requirements, theyâll reduce mercury emissions by 637-682 pounds each year, and lead emissions by 361-420 pounds annually â good news the neurological functioning of children growing up near these facilities.

The Washington Postâs Juliet Eilperin gets the reaction from environmental advocates:

Environmentalists hailed the move as an important precedent for controlling toxic releases into the air, saying EPA based its calculations on the availability of technologies to significantly clean up incinerator pollution. The facilities can install fabric filters to trap toxic particles or scrubbers to capture gaseous releases.

"This is the first time I've ever seen them do an air toxic rule right," said Jim Pew, a lawyer at Earthjustice, a Calif.-based environmental advocacy group that sued the agency over its initial proposal for regulating the incinerators more than a decade ago. "It's a big cut in emissions."

Earthjusticeâs website also provides some context for the victory:

Today's proposal is the result of a decade-long pursuit for stronger protections. In 1997, Earthjustice attorney Jim Pew represented Sierra Club and Natural Resources Defense Council in a successful legal challenge to EPA's weak air pollution standards for medical waste incinerators. Under the Bush administration, the agency delayed for years, until a second successful Earthjustice lawsuit forced them to revamp the standards.

This doesnât negate the many ways in which the Bush administration has weakened environmental protections and adopted less-strict standards than science indicated were necessary to protect human health. And then there are all of the midnight regulations that the Bush administration is rushing to finish. ProPublica has a handy list of these, and they include refusing to regulate perchlorate in drinking water; preventing Congress from stopping a flood of uranium-mining permits for sites near the Grand Canyon; and letting the Interior Department improve construction projects with less concern for endangered species.

So, while the overall picture is bleak, at least those living near medical-waste incinerators can look forward to breathing a little easier.

Categories

More like this

First, the good news: A federal appeals court has struck down a 2006 EPA rule that prohibited state and local governments from strengthening efforts to monitor pollution from power plants, factories, and refineries. Under the Clean Air Act, state and local governments are tasked with issuing…
Today is Blog Action Day, when bloggers around the world post about environmental topics. It seems like a good time to take a look at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, which has been in the news lately. Late last month, as Carol Leonnig reported in the Washington Post, EPA issued new…
EPA has set the limit for pollution-forming ozone in the air to 75 ppb, despite the unanimous advice of the Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee to set it between 60-70 ppb (more here on the health effects of ozone). This is hardly a surprise, given the Bush Administrationâs record. But in this…
The Washington Postâs Juliet Eilperin reports that a âlittle-noticedâ provision in the spending bill signed into law this week will reverse the Bush administrationâs loosening of Toxics Release Inventory reporting requirements. (Check out our past posts on the watered-down requirements and the…

The environment as we know of it today is not the purest thing. Especially, with motor car companies being in mass productions for the past oh my sooo many years and so many more years to come. The environment of the world as we know it hasn't really been performing at it's peak recently. And do we know why? Well of course, I mean we should know why, we basically are the ones to blame. Not specifying anyone in particular but I'm pretty sure us humans have contributed to the most part. But, as much damage as we've done, shouldn't we begin to think on how we can either reverse the effect or at the least minimize the pollution??