On the Gulf Coast, Everyone is a Worker

by Eula Bingham & Anthony Robbins

On April 20th, when the Deepwater Horizon offshore oil rig exploded, eleven workers died. Since then thousands of Gulf Coast citizens have responded to the disaster. Few are professional clean-up workers, but these responders stepped forward rapidly to protect their communities from the consequences of the man-made catastrophe. Health damage to these "workers" may persist long after the booms, berms, and dispersants are gone. They are beginning to report acute symptoms. Obviously they must be protected now, and the protection must also prevent long-term effects.

On the Gulf Coast, no one designed the uneven and slippery surfaces to be safe workplaces. Chemical components of crude oil, weathered oil, dispersants, and volatile vapors will be absorbed through workers' skin and breathed into their lungs. Scientific studies catalog the health consequences of oil spills: damage to pulmonary, immunologic, and endocrine function, plus genetic damage. In our combined experience, most toxic effects of chemicals are easily foreseen. These dangers are likely to endure well beyond control of the oil leak, into a protracted clean-up and lengthy restoration efforts.

Three key responses are needed immediately:

Train workers: Unlike the first responders who arrive when there is an oil spill on our highways, the people of the Gulf Coast have not been taught how to protect themselves and their communities. Already, the National Institute for Environmental Health Sciences put out the call to its centers that train hazardous chemical spill responders to send help to the Gulf Coast. These few trainers are highly knowledgeable in the precautions needed to handle these chemicals, but far more trainers will be needed.

Observe and document exposures: This includes accurate and sufficiently representative measurements of air and contact exposure likely to be experienced by workers. We must create an accurate picture of who has been exposed and by what route-skin, lungs, ingestion-to which chemical agents. The picture will change over time, so this monitoring is a long term commitment. It is also a difficult one that will take resources and ingenuity.

Observe and record health effects: Medical observations will be important, so we can learn what medical problems are caused by exposure to this massive oil spill. This is called disease surveillance, a routine practice in industries where exposures to hazardous chemical are common. And share these medical observations, including blood tests and x-rays with the workers. Enter everyone engaged in clean-up tasks should be entered into a registry designed to allow follow-up.

President Obama has said the federal government is in charge. Government should be enlisting maximum resources from all sectors, starting with its own, to accomplish these critical tasks and protect workers, volunteers, and their communities.

Since 1970, the Federal Government has had the authority and responsibility to protect workers. Our fellow citizens battling this oil spill deserve that same protection guaranteed to all American workers under the Occupational Safety and Health Act. Only the Federal Government can lead this urgent effort.

The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health has forty years experience conducting Health Hazard Evaluations, where its scientists describe and study the consequences of workplace exposures and recommend how the workers can be protected. The vast canvass of the Gulf Coast will requires a major campaign of HHEs to describe the hazards so these workers can be protected, now and into the future.

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration, experienced with catastrophes of many kinds, has over the same period been charged with ensuring workers are safe by enforcing worker protection.

These two Federal agencies will surely need the help and cooperation of other federal agencies, state and local governments, from industry-including those who caused the disaster-and from many volunteers. But when it comes to worker health and safety, they are the leaders and they have the authority. That's what it means "to be in charge."

Dr. Bingham is the former Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health (1977-81); Dr. Robbins the former Director of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (1978-81). Bingham was also a consultant to the Governor of Alaska on the Exxon Valdez spill (1989). This commentary also appeared in the Lake Charles American Press on June 27, 2010.

More like this

A month after the March 1989 Exxon Valdez disaster, a small team of public health experts prepared a report identifying the potential health hazards and making strong recommendations for protective action for the cleanup workers. The team included Eula Bingham, PhD (former OSHA chief), Matt…
by Eileen Senn, MS It seems obvious to many that respirators are needed to protect cleanup workers in the Gulf from inhaling air contaminants that are making some sick now and may make many more chronically ill in the future. I will describe a combination of political and scientific issues…
Dan Rather was the newscaster. His lead for the CBS Evening News on Friday, March 24, 1989 was: "An oil tanker ran aground today off the nation's northern most ice-free port, Valdez, Alaska." The Exxon vessel was holding 53 million gallons of crude oil. By 3:30 am, the Coast Guard estimated that 5.…
by Elizabeth Grossman When the BP/Deepwater Horizon oil rig exploded on April 20, 2010, killing 11 of the 126 workers on board and critically injuring three, the ruptured Macondo well - located nearly a mile beneath the sea surface about 50 miles southeast of Venice, Louisiana - unleashed what has…

Oi estou entrando em contato para oferecer serviço de hospedagem para seu site temos planos apartir de R$10,00 caso queira um plano maior pode entrar em contato por email, todos nossos servidores de hospedagem tem transferencia ilimitadas. Suporte 24Hs por E-mail.
Aguardo o contato mesmo que negativo obrigado.

Grato pela atenção

Ass. Evandro Camargo
Gerente de vendas

Dear Drs. Bingham and Robbins,

Thanks for this good article and for articulating three important responses to the BP Gulf oil spill cleanup to better protect workers. With your help and the help of many other good folks, maybe the mistakes from the Exxon Valdez cleanup in 1989 and 1990 will not be repeated in the Gulf in 2010.

By Mark Catlin (not verified) on 29 Jun 2010 #permalink

Wow. This post makes it seem like there are adults in charge of the cleanup. I think the reality is more like this:
More Dirty Details From My BP Mole
and this:
"We Don't Need This on Camera": BP's Crappy Cleanup Job
And here's a little bit on their "first-response" booming where they put a bunch of orange rubber on the water so that Bobby Jindal could do a flyover and report to the public that he wanted people to know there wasn't much to worry about:

BP Fails Booming School 101 Gulf Oil Spill

BP has not taken the cleanup effort seriously. It's been another BP "Greenwash" and they've prevented scientists and the public alike from access to spill areas and to information, particularly in the first weeks after the spill.

The way to deal with BP is not with kid gloves.

BP doesn't care about Valdez. How do I know that? Because it turns out that BP was charged with the failed safeguards in that disaster too.
BP Played Central Role in Exxon Valdez Disaster

There's no justification for playing nice with BP, or for respecting them at all. They have fostered a corporate culture that spits in the face of decent humans everywhere. Prosecution with the harshest of terms is in order for them.
I'm sick of it. Past my limit. And I'm especially intolerant of "experts" lying to us about it.

Dissolve the corporation, prosecute its executives, lock them up, and throw away the key.
That's what an actual responsible nation would do to BP after this.
This is on par with what Shell has done to Nigeria.
It's a crime against humanity.