Gun violence epidemic: let's try a public health approach

Citizens shot by police. Police shot by citizens. Citizens shot by citizens.

Too many victims. Terror. Tears.

Somebody else's neighborhood. Never in mine.

Racism, disrespect, mental illness, hatred, anger, economic inequality, hopelessness.

Rationalizing? History. Reality.

##

The Gun Violence Archive lists more than 27,390 gun-related incidents in the U.S. which have occurred since January 1, 2016. The result includes nearly 7,100 deaths. Some of the latest additions are those who sadly made this week's headlines: Officer Lorne Ahrens, 48, Philando Castile, 32, Officer Michael Krol, 40Alton Sterling, 37, Officer Michael Smith, 55, Officer Brent Thompson, 43, and Officer Patrick Zamarripa.

Treating gun violence as a public health problem is a special focus of the American Public Health Association (APHA).  The association's executive director, Georges Benjamin, MD, urges policy makers and the public to use the term "epidemic" to characterize our country's gun violence problem. In a commentary published in The Guardian he wrote:

"To reverse the gun violence epidemic – and it’s important that we use the word “epidemic” – we need to do the same thing we’d do for any infectious disease outbreak. ...Time and again a public health approach to solving health threats is a proven, evidence-based approach to improving health and preventing injury. That approach looks upstream to prevent bad things from happening downstream, and then doing everything possible to prevent them.

Looking upstream is the uncomfortable task we continue to avoid.

 

 

More like this

President Barack Obama has signed 23 Executive Orders intended to reduce gun violence in the United States. This alone will not be sufficient--Congress must pass new laws to address this problem as well, and the citizens of the united states have to make some cultural adjustments--but it is a…
Whenever some right-wing associated nut shoots someone, we always hear it described as the actions of a 'lone wolf.' Well, if that's the case then them wolves have formed themselves a pack: -- July 2008: A gunman named Jim David Adkisson, agitated at how "liberals" are "destroying America," walks…
I left this comment on Rob Knop's site: I read this post, and then the comments, and I thought to my self, it would be nice if both sides engage in a discourse. The "anti-gun" side asks for a balance in our society. They compare countries that have lax laws with those that have strict laws ...…
For starters, I've put a bunch of videos including a must see by Jon Steward and another must see by Melissa Harris-Perry HERE. Following is a veritable carnival of topical and timely posts, stories, and sites: Warning shot: Gun violence lands US lowest life expectancy among rich nations…

Looking a little farther upstream…
“… Bureau of Justice Statistics reveal that blacks were charged with 62 percent of robberies, 57 percent of murders and 45 percent of assaults in the 75 biggest counties in the country, despite only comprising roughly 15 percent of the population in these counties.”
http://www.dailywire.com/news/7264/5-statistics-you-need-know-about-cop…

By See Noevo (not verified) on 08 Jul 2016 #permalink

Do you have a point sn, or are you just leaving partial information in another of your racist rants?

One thought Gun Violence costs the country over 2 billion in medical expenses: Why not tax bullets to pay for the medical expenses (and funeral expenses in some cases). Say for example $1 per bullet. sold. Then you could provide coverage for costs for ems and hospitals etc.

Lyle; Chris Rock had a great bit about how bullets should be expensive, like $1,000 each, so if you wanted to go shoot at a guy who said something nasty about your girlfriend, you'd have to get a second job first.

(Obviously, Chris Rock is much, much funnier than I, and tells it much, much better. )

By JustaTech (not verified) on 11 Jul 2016 #permalink

One thought alcohol related Violence costs the country over 2 billion in medical expenses: Why not tax alcohol to pay for the medical expenses (and funeral expenses in some cases). Say for example $1 per ounce of alcohol sold. Then you could provide coverage for costs for ems and hospitals etc.

---------

If peopel can sue gun companies for the actions of violent idiots why can I not Sure Ford Motor company or budweiser if I am in an accident? same concept.

@Lyle2
First of all, think long and hard about what a gun is for and what a car is for

Second, tax on alcohol (or raising the existing tax) - great idea.

As for those people sueing gun companies - any example? Because people have totally sued motor companies for the death of loved ones.

@JustaTech
Thanks for sharing that nice piece from Chris Rock! :)

however one "treats" gun violence please recall that the right to keep and bear firearms is guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution.

By Robert J Kolker (not verified) on 02 Aug 2016 #permalink