Biological Ironies

I was watching David Byrne + Daniel Levitin at The Seed Salon yesterday evening and heard Daniel Levitin (the professor dude) talk about how ironic that the brain, which receives sensory inputs from all over the body, does not itself have sensory nerves. He further added helpfully that you would not know if your brain is poked. It's a nice bit of detail to draw a non-biologist into conversations about biology and brain.

I suppose evolution did not have a good case for the brain to have sensory nerves. It had, after all, already floated the brain in a fluid and surrounded it with a thick skull. There is no value in wiring it with sensory nerves to detect physical harm. I mean, if your brain has been physically poked, you are goner, you are a late person, your metabolic processes are now history, you have ceased to be...

Here's a question along those lines. Is there any other body part (skip the bones, ligaments, etc) that lacks sensory nerves like the brain? Can we, say, poke another organ - apart from the brain - without knowing?

More like this

The penultimate installment of lecture notes in the BIO101 series. Help me make it better - point out errors of fact and suggest improvements: It is impossible to cover all organ systems in detail over the course of just two lectures. Thus, we will stick only to the basics. Still, I want to…
It is impossible to cover all organ systems in detail over the course of just two lectures. Thus, we will stick only to the basics. Still, I want to emphasize how much organ systems work together, in concert, to maintain the homeostasis (and rheostasis) of the body. I'd also like to emphasize…
I was recently sent a strange article for comment…well, not that recently. It's 51 pages long, so I've kind of dragged my heels over it all. I have finally finished it, though, and it is weird. There is a significant tradition in developmental biology that is currently a bit out of fashion: some…
Egnor's at it again, trying to support his idea of dualism. His latest example is much less insane than his last one, so this won't be as entertaining. There's actually a serious question imbedded in it. He's using an analogy with a cell phone (personally, I think he'd have made much more sense if…