Yet another way that miRNAs turn off transcripts

After the last miRNA post, I was alerted to this paper that appeared in the June 15th edition of Nature:

Thimmaiah P. Chendrimada, Kenneth J. Finn, Xinjun Ji, David Baillat, Richard I. Gregory, Stephen A. Liebhaber, Amy E. Pasquinelli & Ramin Shiekhattar
MicroRNA silencing through RISC recruitment of eIF6
Nature (07) 447:823-828

How did I miss that? The basic story is that eIF6 was co-purified with the RISC complex. To remind you RISC is a protein agglomerate that helps miRNAs downregulate the translation of targeted mRNAs into protein. And eIF6 is not a typical eukaryotic translation initiation factor (eIF) ... in fact this protein acts to inhibit the initiation of protein synthesis. eIF6 accomplishes this by binding to the small subunit of the ribosome and thus preventing the small and large ribosomal subunits from assembling onto the mRNA. Without proper ribosomal assembly at the beginning of the transcript, translation of the messager RNA can never start.

When the authors of the study inhibit the production of eIF6, the ability of a miRNA and the RISC complex to inhibit the translation of a target mRNA was severely impaired.

So here is yet another way that miRNAs and RISC inhibit protein synthesis from targeted mRNAs.

Now the big question is how many other ways will miRNAs inhibit translation?

More like this

miRNA and RNA interference is so hot right now ... I'm not in the field, but I do keep an eye on it. Right now the there is quite a few papers on how miRNAs regulate translation. There is some data that indicate that miRNA and the associated RISC complex (RNA Interference Silencing Complex)…
I just wanted to post a brief entry on the newest paper from the Moore lab. I've already hinted at some of these results in a post from last year. As you all know, mRNA is made and processed in the nucleus. During mRNA synthesis, all the introns must be removed and all the exon sequences must be…
I've been struggling with eIF4E. You see eIF4E is the major cytosolic cap binding complex. When mRNA is synthesized in the nucleus the cap is loaded with nuclear cap binding complex, CBP80/20. Then (the story goes) the mRNA is exported to the cytoplasm where the ribosome engages the transcript and…
There are plenty of large mRNA agregates in cells. In the past few years, two of these structures have gained quite a bit of attention, Stress Granules (SGs) and Processing Bodies (PBs). mRNAs in SGs are loaded with 48S complex, which consists of the small ribosomal subunit, the cap binding complex…

.....and soon they gonna FLAG-tag the whole nucleus.....and then the whole cell....and then mother earth. Keep on Tagging !!!

By Dr Evening (not verified) on 04 Jul 2007 #permalink

in how many other ways will miRNAs inhibit translation?

Well...anything is possible...one just has to show it...I would suggest to put FLAG tags to any protein involved in RNA biology (which is actually done in the corresponding lab)...purify all those complexes and go with the most sexy one (always Figure 1 in Cell, Nature or Science...check it out)....do some quick biochemical experiments and ask your co-authors to show the physiological role....and yet we have another stunning paper out there and some new model that revolutionizes our understanding of Biology...

FLAG it or leave it

By Dr Evening (not verified) on 05 Jul 2007 #permalink

So from your veiled comments I gather that you don't buy the results from this, or other studies, coming out of this group?

Well...

This particular paper is quite interesting though the finding that eIF6 binds to the LARGE subunit of the ribosome is rather old. It surely deserves publication. No doubt here. But in my opinion the physilogical relevance is overrated as the paper itself being a full article in Nature. Coming back to your initial question...there is for sure quite a lot of ways in which miRNAs will act on translation.....and with the efforts made so far in the field it does not come as a too big surprise. In general, I am bored reading these FLAG papers one being a blueprint for the other......its a bad machine...totally automatic. There is just no esprit......a mere delivery of data. What was the meaning of PhD again?

Well then....get automatic

By Dr Evening (not verified) on 05 Jul 2007 #permalink