Climate Change and British Butterflies

Maniola jurtina

Another study was published recently in Ecology that sought to tease out and analyze environmental factors (the other regarded deforestation and albedo), this time with a concentration on species diversity, specifically different native butterfly populations in Britain.

The butterflies were split into two main groups:

...habitat specialists, occupying one or a few localized habitats; [and] habitat generalists, occupying widespread and/or many habitats...

The researchers studied three factors affecting butterfly diversity: the direct and indirect (trophic cascade) effects of climate, host-plant richness and habitat diversity. These factors have been studied before, but not in the same capacity; this time around, the researchers used different statistical methods to compartmentalize and find links between them.

Why? Prediction, prediction, prediction.

Climate turned out to be the greatest contributing factor in species diversity, though in differing degrees for each group. The generalist butterflies were three times as susceptible to changes in climate than the other factors. Climate change will almost certainly set new parameters for these species.

The specialists, on the other hand, seemed to be more or less equally affected by all three factors, making any sort of future predictions based on climate or habitat or trophic factors difficult. The specialist butterflies could benefit most from this sort of prediction; their confined habitat requirements are putting many populations at risk.

New Ecology came out this week. I'll have to do some browsing tomorrow (FSU has a subscription; unfortunately, I don't).

More like this

tags: researchblogging.org, conservation, birds, ornithology, ecology, environment, endangered species Image: Robert Linder. I suppose this seems obvious to you city dwellers, but recently published research demonstrates that urban birds are better overall survivors than their country-dwelling…
They say that history is written by the winners, but if that's true, then natural history is written by those who can write. Our ancestors split from the ancestors of chimpanzees some 6 or 7 million years ago, and since then they've given rise to perhaps twenty known species of hominids (and…
Man that's an ugly title. Not much time to post today (until later perhaps) but I did come across an interesting study that improves on geographically-driven predictions of adaptations to climate change. I blogged about a paper on British butterflies earlier this year that studied how much each…
When I ask scientists what's the biggest misunderstanding people have about their work, they often talk about how they know what they know. People tend to think that a scientist's job is to gather every single datum about something in nature--a mountain, a species of jellyfish, a neutron star--and…

I haven't read the study but admit I am surprised. Usually I think of generalists as being more able to adjust (or even adapt) to change. I'll have to read more before commenting.