1. evolgen
  2. Who (or What) Deserves Protection?

Who (or What) Deserves Protection?

By evolgen on July 13, 2006.

At one point in my life, I wanted to study conservation genetics. Now, I just make fun of molecular ecologists and their flawed data. The most recent installment of Ask A ScienceBlogger takes me back to the days before I discovered the wonders of genomics:

Is every species of living thing on the planet equally deserving of protection?

Before I answer the question (or avoid answering the question) allow me to say a couple of things. First of all, this question would be much easier if it were rephrased, "Should we target any particular species for extinction?" If that were the question, my answered would be an emphatic, "NO!" Secondly, I'm assuming by protection they do not mean this or this.

On to my avoidance of answering the question. Designing a conservation program around a single species (or any taxon) is misguided. We should be conserving habitats and ecosystems, not species or populations. The question then becomes which habitats should we protect? My answer: those that are under the greatest threat from human disturbance. I'm not an ecologist or environmental scientist, so I'll differ to them to make the decision regarding the most threatened habitats.

Note: It is still useful to advertise a conservation program using some token species from the habit you are protecting. It's much easier for the public to rally around a cuddly mammal than an icky worm or a gross spider. A useful strategy is to choose a habitat to protect, and then identify a species which would be in danger of going extinct if that habitat were destroyed. You could then campaign to protect that token species, in turn protecting the habitat.

Tags
Ask a ScienceBlogger
biology

More like this

Why protect habitat alone?
Reposted from the old TfK. I suggested at the bottom of a longish post that the Endangered Species Act ought to be supplemented with an Endangered Ecosystem Act. The reason begins with thinking like a mountain. If you've read the last post and my Thinking Like a Savannah and you haven't read Aldo…
North America, Where Lions and Elephants Roam
This post discusses an article published in PLoS Biology reviewing Cornell Ecologist Josh Donlan's idea of importing African analogs of extinct North American vertebrates like the American lion and the mammoth in the hopes that filling these niches will restore and stabilize lost ecosystems. Two…
Extinction rates have NOT been over-estimated
There are several things that cause extinction, but ultimately it is always the same: The last individual (or small number of individuals) of a species die. That may sound like a trivial explanation for extinction but consider what happens when you work backwards from that tragic moment in time…
7 Questions with... Andrew Thaler
Here at The Thoughtful Animal, we are conducting series of seven-question interviews with people who are doing or have done animal research of all kinds - biomedical, behavioral, cognitive, and so forth. Interested in how animal research is conducted, or why animal research is important? Think you…

Not to be picky, but I think you mean "defer" not "differ". Otherwise, you make an excellent point. Protecting a single species is pointless unless you also protect the entire ecosystem it functions in. The golden lion tamarin (found in the Atlantic rainforest of Brazil) is a good example.