Nobel controversy update

Back in October, I wrote about the bittersweet nature of this year's Nobel in Physiology or Medicine.

On the one hand, it was given for early discoveries in the field of innate immunity - my field! On the other hand, it was given to a scientist that many* feel is undeserving of the honor, while at the same time sullying the legacy of my scientific great-grandfather.

Ed Yong rightly called me out for the phrase "many scientists." This term, and another often-used trope, "some scientists," are vague and lazy, since they obscure the details and can mean almost anything. "Many scientists dispute global warming," or "Many scientists dispute evolution," are examples of statements that, while technically true, are misleading and absurd if you know that details.

To further criticize myself, my "many scientists" statement referred mostly to other scientists in Charlie Janeway's and Ruslan Medzhitov's lineage, who aren't necessarily the most unbiased sources. I was gratified, however, to receive several comments on that post from scientists I don't know and that are unrelated to Janeway and Medzhitov who also agreed. In addition, last month, an open letter to Nature, written on behalf of 26 senior scientists (intentionally restricted to people not affiliated with in the lineage of Janeway/Medzhitov*) that say much the same thing.

Immunologists are delighted that the field of innate immunity has been recognized by this year's Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine. However, we believe that the Nobel Committee should also have acknowledged the seminal contributions of immunologists Charles A. Janeway Jr (1943-2003) and Ruslan Medzhitov[...]

The innate-adaptive connection is now a fundamental principle in immunology. We believe that the work of Janeway and Medzhitov was a Nobel-standard breakthrough for immunology.

Yes, this whole exercise is probably meaningless to anyone outside the innate immunity community. But I'm on the inside, and it seems important to me.

---

*See Mike Pollard's comment and my response below.

More like this

Monday's announcement for the Nobel Prize in physiology or medicine should have been a happy occasion for my lab. On the one hand, it was given for early discoveries in the field of innate immunity - my field! On the other hand, it was given to a scientist that many* feel is undeserving of the…
Recipients of the 2011 Nobel Prizes were announced the week of October 3. The winners in medicine were honored for their work in immunology, as reported on Tomorrow's Table. Steinman "discovered a new class of cell, known as dendritic cells, which are key activators of the adaptive immune system…
Most of my favorite long-standing discussions with friends and family tend to resolve around definitions. My good friend Paul and I have had hours upon hours of discussion about the nature of the universe - he calls his perception of the order of the universe "god," and I call myself an atheist (…
Last week the Times ran a story by Andrew Pollack, Benefit and Doubt in Vaccine Additive, that covered some of the ground I trod in my Slate story, "To Boost or Not to Boost: The United States' swine flu vaccines will leave millions worldwide unprotected. Pollack also had the room to explore…

I think you have a busted close tag in there somewhere -
proof it, and repost please!

By MobiusKlein (not verified) on 29 Nov 2011 #permalink

@ Mobius - Gah, that was a bad one. The one time I fail to preview before I post...

Hi Kevin,

Just as an FYI. I seriously doubt that list was "intentionally restricted to people not affiliated with Janeway/Medzhitov" because there are 5 Yale folks in there including one who has been an author on "Immunobiology"; be interesting to know how many others have co-authored with Janeway or Medzhitov but I simply do not have the time to search. The listing is supplementary information for the letter which appears in the Nov 10, 2011 issue of Nature under Correspondence.

Best,
Mike

By Mike Pollard (not verified) on 01 Dec 2011 #permalink

@ Mike - You're right, that was poorly written. I mean to distinguish from the people I was referring to in my first post (all of which had trained with either Charlie or Ruslan), but "not affiliated" implies they had no ties at all. I've edited the post to (hopefully) make that more clear).