Natural disasters figure prominently for both.
Neither necessarily follows international conventions.
In their own ways - doing their part to increase carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere.
When they speak, it's kind of surreal.
I gather, both on the same page with this stem cell business.
Essentially kind of hard to explain rationally.
- Log in to post comments
Let me just add that this is one of my many (many) rejected pieces, and that I'm interested in whether there are other Bush vs Bush items that could be added to such a list.
(was it the new Jess filter that caught you?)
No, I sent it straight to John - with the usual "good things to say, bad things to say" reply (the most useful kind of response really). Funny, but my favourites are 3 and 5, his were 4 and 6.
...Here, I thought of another one:
How's that for twee.
* Both claim to speak on behalf of God.
* The burning bush turned Moses' staff into a snake, whereas many of Bush's staff are snakes.
Too sciency? Nevermind.