Well, didn't know about this, but quite interesting nevertheless. That's right folks - the Duckbill is getting the royal genomic treatment. Looks like the sequencing has been done (6X coverage), and now they're looking to piece those contigs together. (link)
I'd be curious to see what the creationist folks would say about this - the platypus being a favourite with them. Maybe some of the DNA sequences translates into scripture?
(Thanks to Joanne)
- Log in to post comments
More like this
Shotgun sequencing refers to the process whereby a genome is sequenced and assembled with no prior information regarding the genomic location of any of the DNA we sequence. There are quite a few steps that you have to go through before you have an assembled genome sequence. We're going to cover…
You might think the coolest thing about the Next Generation DNA Sequencing technologies is that we can use them to sequence long-dead mammoths, entire populations of microbes, or bits of bone from Neanderthals.
But you would be wrong.
Sure, those are all cool things to do, but Next Generation…
A couple of weeks ago I attended the Human Microbiome Research Conference. At that meeting, one talk by Bruce Birren (and covered by Jonathan Eisen) mentioned something that was completely overlooked by the attendees. Now, I don't blame them, since what Birren mentioned was about bacterial…
What do genetic testing and genealogy have in common?
The easy answer is that they're both used by people who are trying to find out who they are, in more ways than one.
Another answer is that both tests can involve DNA sequence data.
And that leads us to another question. If the sequence of my…
How is the platypus a favourite with creationists? Do they like the idea of a mammal that lays eggs? How about one with a mammary area instead of nipples? What do they find appealing about the lack of vagina?
As a platypus of long standing (check the domain) I think this is great news! :)
To answer your question, pough, it seems that the platypus is a favorite political football among creationists because it seems that earlier ancestors of the platypus (e.g. obdurodon) were actually quite a bit larger. The argument, which I trip over quite often when I'm googling for platypus info but rarely bother to examine in detail, seems to be that bigger is better, that getting smaller represents a form of devolution, and that such an outcome contradicts some strawman form of evolution in which development is always "forward" or "upward" or something. It's a silly argument, refuting creationism as much as evolution, but I guess we're not dealing with logical people here.
That's interesting and also new to me. Never really looked that close except to say that googling the poor animal gets a lot of creationism related hits. I always assumed it had something to do with it's unusual physical characteristics, which ironically is likely the same reason why it was chosen for a genome project.
Big ups if they get good sequence of the chain of sex chromosomes. This will really help with our understanding of mammalian evolution.
You can find a list of all eukaryote sequencing projects at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genomes/leuks.cgi
part of it can also be seen in the ENSEMBL genome browser
http://www.ensembl.org/index.html