Who says, society can't influence the definition of the truth? (Well, in the Web2.0 context anyway). Apparently, it already has. (Origin of this experiment here)
- Log in to post comments
More like this
Well, looky here now...
With the strength of the Science Scout initiative behind it, our little Truth experiment has finally hit front page google real estate.
That's right, people, we're hovering at a pretty nice ranking. What ranking is that you ask? Ta da.
Freaking number seven!
Which,…
Scibling Bora has expressed his wish "to end once for all the entire genre of discussing the "bloggers vs. journalists" trope," and tried to do so with perhaps the most massive science-journalism-Web2.0 post evah.
Bora says,
the whole "bloggers will replace journalists" trope is silly and wrong. No…
McGrath is back, straining to refute atheism. This time, his argument is with the claim that faith is blind. Is not, he says! And then proceeds to muddle together faith with belief with morality with science until he's got a nice incoherent stew, at which time he points to a few floaty bits in the…
Last week I posted an entry on Nature Publish Group, scientific publishing and web2.0. I'd like to add a couple of points, and throw out some links.
I would like to emphasize two points:
1) Feasibility. Yes we all want open information, but how to do it? And how to make it financially feasible?…