Murphy's Law equation

Ah, here it is:

i-ac2c61fac425af9f2f3ec09b4e5341eb-murphy.gif

Mind you, if we're true to the real spirit of Murphy's Law, there's undoubtedly something wrong with this equation as well. For an explanation, check out here at the SCQ.

More like this

It would have been funnier if I, C, U, F, and Fm had reasonable sounding values. Importance on a scale of 10 sounds dopey on its face, just like 'on a scale of 1 to 10' never gives the kind of scale, the expected distribution, and so on.

If I, C, and U were bounded by the interval [0,1] then it would be easier to pitch this to suits.

There needs to be some revision to make sure that the exponent is a dimensionless group.

But I did like the old joke about the 386 computer.