I think this statement should be obvious, and for that reason alone, we've included it in the SCQ's list of truths.
This, by the way, is a web experiment run by the Quarterly. The background can be found here, and I'll note that I'm constantly surprised by its staying power. On a general google.com search, the list of truths still ranks in the top 10 for the keyword "truth."
In case, you're curious, the celebrity that comes to mind, is all the silliness associated with Jenny McCarthy, but a list of others in the comment section, would be lovely to have on hand.
- Log in to post comments
More like this
So... the SCQ is back from its summer hiatus, and needs to get rid of a 30G 5th generation video iPod. Sort of like this one:
And it actually couldn't be easier to win. Here are the details:
After a much need hiatus over the summer, the SCQ is back for it's third volume. We thought we would…
So a couple months ago, I sat down with some science educator types and we had a bit of a tete a tete over the Science Creative Quarterly, and how surreal it seems to have this sizable readership growing. We also discussed how lovely it is that sites like Boingboing or Digg will benefit that…
<a href="http://scq.ubc.ca/?p=677">truth</a>Use this code as often as you can.
A while back, I wrote a post asking ScienceBloggers what they thought were successful tactics in the game of initiating forms of viral marketing. The question was primarily posed to ask whether such tricks…
I'm going to intermittently keep track of the comments I make on other blogs. I'll spare you the totally trivial ones, but I don't guarantee this to be especially interesting. One point of doing this will be to track the ones that "disappear" on various sites (no names for now) that I've found don'…
Things can also get interesting when celebrities and science converge:
http://radiodiatribe.com/category/pharma/
When scientific celebrities and science don't mix - this happens.
Here's another good example. If you can't be bothered to read the
article, the url sums it up pretty well.
http://www.badscience.net/2008/04/cliff-richard-gloria-hunniford-carole…
I think it is 100% true that celebrities like Tye Pennington should not be trusted and, in fact, should be ashamed of themselves for peddling drugs they know nothing about, so they can make a buck.
However, I think Jenny McCarthy should be distinguished from people like Pennington. I am not saying that I think there is a relationship between autism and vaccines. I really have no idea...in fact, I have never thought about the two things together. But, just because she is a celebrity, a mom, a non-scientist (whatever) does not make this an illegitimate question. All too often scientific researchers do not study causes of diseases that are related to things like environmental contamination, industrialization, technology, etc...This is not necessarily because they are evil; it has to do with the ways that scientific research gets prioritized and funded, etc..etc..and so on.
In many different contexts (I'm thinking about AIDS activists, Breast Cancer Activists, Psychiatric Survivors, Environmental Activists), non-scientists or non-experts make legitimate contributions to debates about health and disease. Many times, they teach scientists something about how they should go about treating and understanding diseases.