Over at Good math, bad math, Mark has a bit more on mathematical modeling. Before anyone screams "witch hunt," please note:
I'll leave the science debate over at Aetiology, where it belongs. But there's definitely a mathematical aspect to this. Professor Culshaw lends her authority as a mathematician to the HIV denialist folks. Does her math support what she's saying?
Alas, no.
Professor Culshaw is not a bad mathematician - quite the opposite. What I can read of her publications shows very solid mathematical work, done extremely well.
The problem is that when she tries to apply the mathematics to the science of epidemiology, she fails miserably, and the reason why is mathematical.
Elaboration at the link.
- Log in to post comments
More like this
So, much attention has been drawn to my comment pointing out that Rebecca Culshaw is a mathematician (well, isn't she?), while my elaboration in my very next comment was ignored. So I thought I'd take some time to highlight this, and discuss the problems in general with arguments from authority…
Regular readers may recall me previously discussing Rebecca Culshaw (for reference, threads can be found here and here). She's a PhD mathematician who wrote two articles discussing her departure from her prior research, which focused on mathematical models of HIV infection. I pointed out in one…
Regular readers are very familiar with my refrain that many science deniers use the same tactics: bad arguments, quote-mining, appeals to authority, castigation of originators of respective theories, etc. etc. Another common thread is the complete bastardization of statistical analysis. Mark Chu…
There was a postdoc in my research group in grad school who had a sister in college. She called him once to ask for help with a math assignment dealing with series expansions. He checked a book to refresh his memory, and then told her how to generate the various series needed for her homework…
Dr Culshaw makes herself slightly more clear here.
Why I Quit HIV: The Aftermath
The problem isn't her mathematics it's her comments on epidemiology, molecular biology. antibody tests etc.
Culshaw is a reason why I am a biologist first and a theoretician second.