You talk to your expectorated matter. In "science-ese." At least, by that post anyway, there's no evidence it was expected to reply...
- Log in to post comments
More like this
If you live in the US you know that the Fox News Network prides itself on being the Voice of the Fatherland, connotation intended. Fox and its sleazy news anchors are not only doggedly pro-Bush but doggedly Far Right and poorly concealed racists and nativists. I don't watch it (I take my daily…
We last saw Fumento blundering around in a field of rakes. Now read on. John Fleck commented on the situation:
The thing is, Fumento is, at times, a quite talented journalist. But then, over and over again, he shows himself to be a complete tool.
My first encounter with his work was a solid take-…
NERC has a bold new initiative... the NERC Climate Change Challenge. As they say Scientific evidence demonstrates clearly that human activity is changing the planet's climate. But there are still sceptics who dispute the data and its interpretation. If you don't believe the science, please tell us…
John Pieret reads Jerry Coyne so you don't have to. He notes that Coyne's experience at a moderate church reading group sounds awfully accommodationist, and it does!
Of course, "accommodationist" is a highly mutable term, so I'm sure Jerry will say he isn't really, and the label doesn't really…
As long as your saliva doesn't talk back, you're ok.
Oddly enough, despite the fact that I measure hormone concentrations in saliva almost daily, I don't talk to it. Perhaps if I started I would get better results?
dirt pill thereapy for asthma
When an order is given, the only reply expected is "Sir, yes sir!"
However, my saliva has been very subordinate and nonresponsive of late...