Andrea over at Pandas Thumb highlights a new JCI article with a call to action for scientists.
The Journal of Clinical Investigation is a top-notch journal, and their editors seem to "get it." They wrote an editorial last year which I discussed here (moved over from the old blog) discussing intelligent design, and why more scientists should pay attention to it. Good that they're continuing the effort by publishing this new paper.
- Log in to post comments
More like this
A looong time ago, I mentioned that I spent St. Patrick's Day weekend in Wartburg College in Waverly, Iowa, at a symposium I helped to plan (but neglected to blog! Oops). Along with other scientists, theologians, philosophers, and generally interested persons, we worked for a bit over a year to…
In the comments on a post below, Dan Ray suggested that perhaps Stephen Meyer's article on ID in the Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington had gotten into that journal by "questionable means". He was apparently right. The editor at the time, Richard Sternberg, apparently violated the…
I know that you know that I work for PLoS. So, I know that a lot of you are waiting for me to respond, in some way, to the hatchet-job article by Declan Bucler published in Nature yesterday. Yes, Nature and PLoS are competitors in some sense of the word (though most individual people employed by…
The Kansas City Star had an article in Sunday's paper that suggested that the ongoing battles between intelligent design creationism and evolution were damaging the state's ability to attract businesses involved in scientific and technical fields:
"They want to bring things like intelligent design…