For anyone interested in a short review of nanoparticles as ligands (which I mentioned here but obviously isn't my area of expertise), there's a review in the April issue of TRENDS in Biotechnology (volume 24(4):143-145 in case the link doesn't work). As always, you can drop me a line if you don't have access to the full text. (And it's easier for me if you actually email rather than leave it in the comments--that way I don't forget about it!)
- Log in to post comments
More like this
So, as mentioned yesterday, I got an email asking me about the weird scandal involving the Patriots and underinflated footballs, so I wrote a piece for the Conversation on the subject. since a few people had beaten me to citations of the Ideal Gas Law, though, I decided to bring my own particular…
Once again, please don't forget about our DonorsChoose drive! Please click in the panel to you left, and go make a donation to help schools get the supplies they need to be able to teach math!
Most people must have heard by now that about a week ago, T-mobile
released the first Android based…
For my sins, I decided to listen to Murray "I have a theory" Salby talking about his ideas about why the recent rise in CO2 isn't human-caused (note that isn't his most recent UK tour; that's back in April). By all means read my notes below if you're interested in the various ways that he is wrong…
As discussed last week, the comments about the perfect-scoring SAT essays published in the New York Times made me wonder whether bloggers could do any better. On the plus side, bloggers write all the time, of their own free will. On the minus side, they don't have to work under test conditions,…
I liked it better when they called nanotechnology "chemistry".
Oh well.