Review available on nanotech

For anyone interested in a short review of nanoparticles as ligands (which I mentioned here but obviously isn't my area of expertise), there's a review in the April issue of TRENDS in Biotechnology (volume 24(4):143-145 in case the link doesn't work). As always, you can drop me a line if you don't have access to the full text. (And it's easier for me if you actually email rather than leave it in the comments--that way I don't forget about it!)

More like this

So, as mentioned yesterday, I got an email asking me about the weird scandal involving the Patriots and underinflated footballs, so I wrote a piece for the Conversation on the subject. since a few people had beaten me to citations of the Ideal Gas Law, though, I decided to bring my own particular…
I've recently taken to using the magic of the internet to give my students access to readings, assignments, and images outside of class. It's great - if my sophomores lose their map, they can print another one. If a student misses class, there's no excuse not to do the homework anyway. If students…
Once again, please don't forget about our DonorsChoose drive! Please click in the panel to you left, and go make a donation to help schools get the supplies they need to be able to teach math! Most people must have heard by now that about a week ago, T-mobile released the first Android based…
The other day I commented on an article by Peter Bancel and Roger Nelson that reported evidence that "the coherent attention or emotional response of large populations" can affect the output of quantum-mechanical random number generators. I was pretty dismissive of the article; in fact elsewhere I…

I liked it better when they called nanotechnology "chemistry".

Oh well.

By Urinated State… (not verified) on 03 May 2006 #permalink