For anyone interested in a short review of nanoparticles as ligands (which I mentioned here but obviously isn't my area of expertise), there's a review in the April issue of TRENDS in Biotechnology (volume 24(4):143-145 in case the link doesn't work). As always, you can drop me a line if you don't have access to the full text. (And it's easier for me if you actually email rather than leave it in the comments--that way I don't forget about it!)
- Log in to post comments
More like this
So, as mentioned yesterday, I got an email asking me about the weird scandal involving the Patriots and underinflated footballs, so I wrote a piece for the Conversation on the subject. since a few people had beaten me to citations of the Ideal Gas Law, though, I decided to bring my own particular…
Once again, please don't forget about our DonorsChoose drive! Please click in the panel to you left, and go make a donation to help schools get the supplies they need to be able to teach math!
Most people must have heard by now that about a week ago, T-mobile
released the first Android based…
So I ran across this thread, and it made me sad. (And no, not because it wasn't Ed Yong's blog, although that too.)
It started off as a happy post: the author, Paula Chambers, is a PhD who began her own online community for PhDs seeking jobs outside academia. That's awesome. But when Chambers went…
For my sins, I decided to listen to Murray "I have a theory" Salby talking about his ideas about why the recent rise in CO2 isn't human-caused (note that isn't his most recent UK tour; that's back in April). By all means read my notes below if you're interested in the various ways that he is wrong…
I liked it better when they called nanotechnology "chemistry".
Oh well.