Intro to Jon Wells' "Politically Incorrect Guide to Darwinism and ID" at Panda's Thumb

Check it out here. I mentioned previously that I'll be reviewing another chapter of the book in the future, and PZ has a write-up of the chapter on developmental biology here (that will be posted to Panda's Thumb in the coming days), and he also has some suggestions here on how bloggers can help make the rebuttals to this nonsense stand out. As Reed notes in his introduction to the book:

The Discovery Institute is the epicenter of "intelligent design" activism, which took a major blow when Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District effectively declared it religiously motivated pseudoscience, unfit for public schools. Now in this first year after Dover, the "intelligent design" activists have been busy picking up the pieces, trying to hide their defeat in Dover behind a "new" marketing campaign. The Politically Incorrect Guide to Darwinism and Intelligent Design, for which the Discovery Institute is holding a party, is part of this marketing campaign, and because of all this, one might reasonably argue that, in addition to the author and the publisher, the Discovery Institute bears responsibility for the poor quality of this book.

This is just another step in the Discovery Institute's PR campaign, and however y'all can lend a hand to make it less effective is certainly welcome. Keep an eye on science blogs and Panda's Thumb in the next two weeks for the chapter takedowns, and promote them as much as you can.

More like this

I finally got to meet Reed Cartwright in person last night. Now that he is in Raleigh, and Panda's Thumb resides in my old building on campus, I hope I'll see him more often. Speaking of Panda's Thumb, it is currently, as in "this week", demonstrating the power of the scienceblogging community,…
Burt's write-up of Wells' first chapter of The Politically Incorrect Guide to Darwinism and Intelligent Design is up at The Panda's Thumb. PZ's also re-posted his review of Chapter 3 at PT; link here.
Aww, poor Intelligent Design creationism is feeling unloved. Or perhaps it's jealousy. David Klinghoffer, that clueless ideologue at the Discovery Institute, is whimpering that blogging scientists aren't paying enough attention to his brand of creationism. Darwinian scientists who blog -- in other…
John West of the Discovery Institute has presented his version of the year in ID. In summary: A year after Dover, Darwinists seem increasingly disillusioned as well as shrill, the central part of Judge Jones' "brilliant" decision has been found to be riddled with errors and copied nearly verbatim…