Sentence in for bacteria-mailing professor

Last fall I wrote about the bizarre case of University of Pittsburgh geneticist Robert Ferrell. Dr. Ferrell, you may recall, had been prosecuted for sharing generally-harmless strains of bacteria with a colleague, SUNY-Buffalo art professor Steven Kurtz. Dr. Kurtz then used the bacterial cultures in an art display, which drew the attention of authorities following the death of Dr. Kurtz's wife. Then all hell broke loose (after the jump):

Ferrell violated [the Material Transfer Agreement] by sharing the strains with Kurtz. Normally, this would be an issue handled between Ferrell (and his university) and ATCC [American Type Culture Collection]; however, under the broad definitions of mail and wire fraud under the Patriot Act, the government stepped in and charged Kurtz and Ferrell with mail and wire fraud--felonies that, since they're being charged under the Patriot Act, could carry a possible 20-year sentence.

While Kurtz is still facing prosecution, Ferrell plead guilty last fall to one count of "mailing an injurious article," and was just sentenced--a $500 fine, probation, and his assistance in prosecuting Kurtz.

It's good that Ferrell received a mild sentence, but the whole fiasco remains absurd. The Post-Gazette article notes that "Since the prosecution began, Dr. Ferrell has had three strokes and dealt twice with cancer."

We need to deal with bioterrorist treats, granted. But spending years prosecuting this case--and potentially additional years with Kurtz's--isn't making us safer. It's a distraction and a waste.

More like this

Being a microbiologist can be a dangerous business. Some of us work out in the field, exposed to weather, animals, and pathogens of all different forms. Some do research in countries with unstable governments, collecting samples and tracking down infected individuals in the midst of strife,…
Tara has a real horror story: a geneticist failed to follow procedure in mailing some samples, sharing some harmless commercial strains of some innocuous and common bacteria with an artist, the kind of thing that a bureaucrat would reasonably respond to with a hand-slap and insistence that the…
The US bioterrorism program has claimed another victim. Not from a lab accident. Not from an attack. But from a ridiculous and mindless application of regulations meant to protect us from malefactors but which have instead punished scientists who may (or may not) have made missteps in this new…
The art professor is finally cleared but a distinguished biologist was still punished by a ridiculous, mindless, cruel and utterly reckless use of raw power by the Bush administration: A federal judge dismissed criminal indictments on Monday against an art professor at the State University of New…

Agreed. This isn't making any one safer from anything. What it is likely to do is make researchers a lot more hesitant about sharing cell lines, plasmids and bacteriological strains with their colleagues. It's certainly had that effect on me.

I saw a sympathetic film about the Kurtz case, in which the continuing prosecution of Kurtz and Ferrell appeared to be motivated by prosecutors' desire to justify an absurdly paranoid overreaction after the fact. Unless there are facts not brought out in the film that might suggest another explanation, I have to agree: Kurtz and Ferrell should never have been charged, let alone hounded for years.