THIS JUST IN - No Holds on Science Nominees!

The New York Times has just reported that the Senate Commerce Committee held a closed-door, unannounced markup earlier today. During the markup, the Committee unanimously approved both John Holdren and Jane Lubchenco, and both nominations are expected to move to the floor.

According to the Times, both John Rockefeller (the Committee Chair) and Kay Bailey Hutchison (the ranking Republican) say that all holds that they know of have been released, and that the nominees should be confirmed sometime this week.

I'll keep an eye on this story, and let you know if there are any changes. I'd like to thank everyone who took the time to contact members of the Senate, and everyone who tolerated several days of my near monomaniacal focus on this issue.

More like this

As of this morning, the situation surrounding the Senate confirmations of John Holdren as head of the Office of Science and Technology Policy and Jane Lubchenco as NOAA Administrator is somewhat confused. A number of new news articles and blog posts have appeared over the last couple of days.…
It appears that yesterday's reports that New Jersey Democrat Robert Menendez was holding up the confirmation of both the Science Advisor and the NOAA administrator were not entirely correct. He may well be delaying these confirmations, but he's apparently not the only one. CQ Politics is now…
'Holds' on NOAA Administrator & Science Advisor Confirmations. Call Senators Now.: The Washington Post is reporting that Senate votes to confirm Jane Lubchenco as NOAA Administrator and John Holdren as Science Advisor are currently being obstructed by a Democratic Senator. Quoting multiple…
As of this morning, it appears that the nominations of both John Holdren and Jane Lubchenco (the President's picks for Science Advisor and NOAA Administrator, respectively) are still stalled in the Senate. If we don't raise more hell over this issue - and keep raising hell - it's likely that these…

Mike, thanks for your strong focus on this issue. Besides the urgency of restoring scientific leadership (and integrity) to the Executive branch, there's another reason:

For at least the next 2 years (and probably even after the midterm elections), the Senate will act as THE GREAT DELAYER. Given our race past climate tipping points, (... to mangle a metaphor ...), Legislation delayed is Environmental Justice denied. Permanently. Irreversibly.

It's crucial that Democrats (e.g, Menendez, Ben Nelson of Nebraska, Landrieu of LA) not be allowed to undercut any of Obama's initiatives. Because if we give those Democrats an inch, the Republicans will take a mile!

Rick rises an important point, no less so because it is historically obvious. The Senate has always been, always will be the great delayer in our creaky democracy. The letter delivered today, by eight Democrats declaring their right to join with Republicans to "filibuster climate change legislation," shows - once again - how troublesome Senate structure can be when something should be dealt with speedily.

Those eight are:

Robert Byrd (WV), Blanche Lincoln (AR), Ben Nelson (NE), Evan Bayh (IN), Mark Pryor (AR), Bob Casey (PA), Carl Levin (MI), and Mary Landrieu (LA).

He certainly does raise a good point, and it's one I'm hoping I'll be able to take a look at in the near future. I'm planning to start with a detailed look at the "hold", where it came from, and what it does. But not until after these two nominees are confirmed.