Tidbits, 14 August 2009

I am furloughed today and going out of town, so here, have an early tidbits post.

  • I won't be at the iPRES 2009 conference, but I do recommend looking over the program; it gives a pretty good overview of what digital preservationists think about and study, and what keeps them awake at night. (Midwesterners: the International Digital Curation Conference is coming to Chicago in 2010. I'll be there!)
  • The strength of weak ties: why Twitter matters to scholarly communication. Spot on, and true of FriendFeed as well. This is why, privacy concerns aside, the Facebook acquisition of FriendFeed is a threat; the friends-and-family design limits or eliminates casual elbow-rubbing.
  • Digital Library Services in the Information Arcade from the University of Iowa. This is an e-research service approach worth pondering. Rather than create a digital-curation or digital-humanities outfit from whole cloth, Iowa is adding consulting responsibilities (and additional services TBD, apparently) to an existing service brand whose former responsibilities have to some extent gone elsewhere. I'll be watching this, and I hope Iowa lets us know how it's going. Love the planning wiki, too.
  • Research data preservation and access: the views of researchers. Seems about right to me. Would researchers care to comment in the comments?
  • From SciBling John Wilbanks, Publishing science on the web. I haven't blogged yet about openness and e-research, but I will be, because e-research without openness is so much technology-enhanced window-dressing. Consider John's post a sneak peek at the sort of thing I think about.
  • Reading with Machines. Well-written discussion of where computers fit in textual scholarship, with which I entirely agree. Nice mini-bibliography at the end, too.

I have a few more links in the pipeline, but I think this'll do. Happy (furloughed or not) Friday!

Tags

More like this

Lively welcome here at ScienceBlogs, I must say. Two posts, a soft launch, and eighteen comments already! The comments have turned up a question deserving of further discussion. On my first post, commenter Jim Lund said: E-research? Why make a distinction? Today there's only e-research and…
That would be the question, wouldn't it. Unfortunately, such fundamental definitions are never simple to create, and even less simple to agree upon. A little history may help explain how we got into this parlous uncertain state, but it may not get us out of it. The short version of the history (…
The publisher Information Today runs a good and useful book series for librarians who find themselves with job duties they weren't expecting and don't feel prepared for. There's The Accidental Systems Librarian and The Accidental Library Marketer (that one's new) and a whole raft of other accidents…
I got a very nice email the other day thanking me for being a clearinghouse for e-research information. I'm not quite sure I am that, but just in case I've become it without noticing… What I read in the area and think is worthwhile enough to keep around ends up in a few places, all of which have…