# How often does the sun emit 1 TeV photons?

I had an interesting question posed to me recently: how frequently does the sun emit photons with an energy greater than 1 TeV?

All of you know about the experiments going on at the LHC, where particles are accelerated to an energy which is equivalent to an electron being accelerated through a potential difference of trillions of volts (which is what a "trillion electron volts" - a TeV is). During the ensuing collisions between particles, high-energy TeV photons are produced. Of course everything is emitting light in the form of blackbody radiation all the time. Human beings emit mostly long-wavelength infrared, hot stoves emit shorter-wavelength infrared and red light, hotter objects like the sun emit across a broad range of wavelengths which include the entire visible spectrum. Here, from Wikipedia, is the spectrum of the sun:

This graph is given in terms of wavelength. For light, energy corresponds to frequency, and frequency is inversely proportional to wavelength. Longer wavelength, lower frequency. A TeV is a gigantic amount of energy, which corresponds to a gigantically high frequency and thus a wavelength that would be pegged way the heck off the left end of this chart pegged almost but not quite exactly at 0 on the x axis. Let me reproduce the same blackbody as the Wikipedia diagram, but cast in terms of frequency:

Here the x-axis is in hertz, and the y-axis is spectral irradiance in terms of watts per square meter per hertz. (That makes a difference - it's not just the Wikipedia graph with the x-axis relabeled although it gives the same watts-per-square-meter value when integrated over the same bandwidth region.)

Ok, so what's the frequency of a 1 TeV photon? Well, photon energy is given by E = hf, where h is Planck's constant and f is the frequency. Plugging in, a 1 TeV photon has an frequency of about 2.4 x 1026 Hz. That's way off the right end of the graph. Thus you might think the answer is zero - the sun never emits such high-energy photons. But then again that tail never quite reaches zero, and there's a lot of TeVs per watt, and there's a lot of square meters on the sun...

So to find out more exactly, let's take a look at the actual equation which gave us that chart: Planck's law for blackbody radiation:

$latex \displaystyle B(f) = \frac{ 2 h f^3}{c^2} \frac{1}{e^\frac{h f}{kT} - 1}&s=2$

So you'd integrate that from 2.4 x 1026 Hz to infinity if you wanted to find how many watts per square meter the sun emits at those huge frequencies. (Here k is Boltzmann's constant, which is effectively the scale factor that converts from temperature to energy.) That's kind of an ugly integral though, but we can simplify it. That $latex e^\frac{h f}{kT}$ term? It's indescribably big. The hf term is 1 TeV, and the kT is about 0.45 eV (which is a "typical" photon energy emitted by the sun), so the exponential is on the order of e2200000000000. (The number of particles in the observable universe is maybe 1080 or so, for comparison.) Subtracting 1 from that gigantic number is absolutely meaningless, so we can drop it and end up with:

$latex \displaystyle B(f) = \frac{ 2 h f^3}{c^2} e^{-\frac{h f}{kT}}&s=2$

which means the answer in watts per square meter is

$latex \displaystyle I = \int_{a}^{\infty}\frac{ 2 h f^3}{c^2} e^{-\frac{h f}{kT}} \, df&s=2$

where "a" is the 1  TeV lower cutoff (in Hz). That exponential term now has a negative sign, so it's on the order of e-2200000000000. I'd say this is a safe place to stop and say "The answer is zero, the sun has never and will never emit photons of that energy through blackbody processes." But let's press on just to be safe.

That expression above can be integrated pretty straightforwardly. I let Mathematica do it for me:

$latex \displaystyle I = e^{-\frac{a h}{k T}}\frac{2 k T (a^3 h^3+3 a^2 h^2 k T+6 a h k^2 T^2+6 k^3 T^3 )}{c^2 h^3}&s=2$

So that's an exponential term multiplying a bunch of stuff.  That bunch of stuff is a big number, because "a" is a big number and h is a tiny number in the denominator. I plug in the numbers and get that the stuff term is about 1093 watts per square meter, and you have to multiply that by the 1018 or so square meters on the surface of the sun. That's a very big number, but it's not even in the same sport as that e-2200000000000 term. Multiplying those terms together doesn't even dent the  e-2200000000000 term. It's still zero for all practical purposes

Which is a lot of work to say that our initial intuition was correct. 1 TeV from blackbody processes in the sun? Forget it.

Now blackbody processes aren't the only things going on in the sun. I don't think there are too many TeV scale processes of other types, but stars can be weird things sometimes. I'd be curious to know if astrophysicists would know of other processes which might bump the TeV rate to something higher.

[Personal note: I've been absent on ScienceBlogs since April, I think. Why? Writing my dissertation, defending, and summer interning. The upshot of all that is those things are done and I'm now Dr. Springer, and I have a potentially permanent position lined up next year. And now I might even have time to write some more!]

Tags

### More like this

##### Quick, hit the brakes!
A reader emailed me a fun question from a physics exam he took, along these lines: A car driver going at some speed v suddenly finds a wide wall at a distance r. Should he apply brakes or turn the car in a circle of radius r to avoid hitting the wall? My first thought was that surely the question…
##### Light from a Hairbrush
Question from a reader: Pick up a comb, rub it with your hair and you have got some electric charge. Now shake it and you are generating an electromagnetic wave. Am I right? Yes indeed. So why don't we see light emitted when we brush our hair? Let's run some numbers. If you wiggle around an…
##### The Human Eye, Optimized For Sunlight. Maybe.
The human eye is sensitive to a portion of the electromagnetic spectrum that we call visible light, which extends from around 400 to 700 nanometer wavelength, peaking in the general vicinity of greenish light at 560 nanometers: Here's the intensity (formally: power per area per unit solid angle per…
##### The Mathematics of Reddit Rankings, or, How Upvotes Are Time Travel
Ok, so this isn't really physics as such, but it's pretty fascinating. There's a very large online community called Reddit in which users submit links which interest them. These links come with two little arrows beside them, and the users can vote the link up or down. Here's a screenshot of how the…

Congratulations Dr Springer.

By Acleron (not verified) on 27 Nov 2013 #permalink

What is the highest energy photon likely to be emitted by black body radiation by the sun this year?

By MobiusKlein (not verified) on 28 Nov 2013 #permalink

Congrats Dr Springer, and great post! Integrals, how lovely :)

By wereatheist (not verified) on 28 Nov 2013 #permalink

Congratulations!

By Sue VanHattum (not verified) on 28 Nov 2013 #permalink

Interesting deduction.
However the mean energy of particles or photons at the very
center of the sun is around 1000 eV. Even there TeV domain looks to be impossible!

By Anandaram Mandyam (not verified) on 01 Dec 2013 #permalink

Hi, very interesting and nice post. I'm quite sure there are >= 1 TeV photons accelerated by black hole. Anyway, my question is: why are you looking for 1 TeV photons exactly? Is there any measurement reporting more high-energy photons than expected?
Another point is that I'm not really sure that Sun's atmosphere is transparent to 1 TeV photons, so maybe they are produced, but their energy gets "thermalized". I don't know for sure, just saying.

By Riccardo Di Sipio (not verified) on 15 Dec 2013 #permalink