There's Gold in them thar Spacecraft: LISA 6

i-88e3cfa9ec7ee8351a1f5bd93abf41a1-LISAmass2.jpg

The actual LISA spacecraft

Or, one of the three modules.

That is a 1.96 kg cube of 3/4 gold, 1/4 platinum.

The actual LISA spacecraft, in a very real sense, is three of those, separated by 5 million kms.

At about $600 per ounce, that is a little over $100,000 of precious metal. Each of these is surrounded by about a 2 m "saucer", which is the auxilliary spacecraft.

Somewhat amusingly, depending on how you do your accounting, the ~ 300kg of epoxy, metal, optics and electronics wrapped around the gold/platinum cube is the expensive part. Per unit mass the chunk of gold is the cheapest part of the spacecraft!

The cube material was basically chosen to be dense, non-corrosive and to have very low magnetic susceptibility.
The cubes are in free falling orbits, and the surrounding spacecraft maneuvers continuously to center on the cubes. The cubes are actually in tight vacuum enclosures (the vacuum of space is not quite good enough, mainly because of random volatile outgassing by the spacecraft); optical sensors and capacitors track the position of the cube and low powered FEEP thrusters maneuver the disk module to center on the cube.
For the purpose of tracking wiggles in spacetime, a 2m saucer in solar orbit is not in good enough a free fall orbit, radiation pressure and solar wind drag is a measurable gross perturbation on the orbit.

Small stable lasers are emitted by each module to the other two, 5 million km away, where they are detected by 40cm telescopes and the light is allowed to interfere.
That is the measurement done by the spacecraft, the time variation in the pattern of interference fringes made by 3 lasers shone in an equilateral triangle, tracking the position of the cubes.

The interference pattern is measured with an accuracy of about one part in 10 million in phase, sampled about once per second. This gives an effective measurement of the relative change in separation in time scales from 1 second to 1 hour of a few hundred picometers. That is less than the width of an atom change, over 5 million km. (On longer time scales the separation drifts by thousands of km, but that shows up as DC or very low frequency drift, quite distinct from the milliHertz oscillations that are the primary science measurement).

That's it. Simple really. Then you send the measurements (the choice of which variables to measure and transmit is slightly non-trivial, you can form different orthogonal combinations of variables and to some extent choose what to optimise in measuring). Track the separation as a function of time for several years - nominal mission is 5 years, extended mission is 10 years, limited by FEEP thruster fuel supply.

And that is how we expect to see, among other things the final stages of merger of supermassive black holes, emitting a million times more energy that the brightest supernova in a few seconds, with almost all the energy going into rippling space time itself.

There will be several other sources, including compact binaries in the Milky Way, and "local" supermassive black holes eating low mass stellar black holes. There will also probably be surprises, serendipitous sources that no one predicted. And, a good source (we hope for S/N > 1000 sources) will allow very strong tests of strong field gravity - we will test General Relativity in the extreme.

Next: some of the atrophysics of the sources...

Tags

More like this

Bats' ears at AMNH To really see in the dark, at some point you must abandon the light... You can go far in faint light by using high efficiency detectors, large collecting areas and amplification; but, as nature discovered a long time ago, to really find things in the dark you need to switch to…
If you've been reading ScienceBlogs for a while, you might remember this little physics blog I used to write. It and I sort of vanished off the internet for a long while. More than a year, I'm sad to say. Long story short, being a grad student takes up a huge amount of time. While I sort of thought…
If you have been on the internet, you surely have seen this website showing the sizes of different starships. Way cool. Here is a small sample - but it doesn't do the site justice. You really need to go browse around. Of course, I can't let something like this just go. One of the things I…
Ok, I read the BEPAC full report, all 201 pages. Interesting stuff, lots to glean from it. First, Con-X community letter on Exploding Galaxies and other Catastrophysics, with some interesting comments from Prof Superwinds. NASA HQ has still not responded to the BEPAC report. Way back when, my…

Wow. An exciting experiment, and it sounds just a little loopy as well- manouvring the craft around the piece of alloy. So I assume that if they do detect gravity waves, the news will be all over the media?

I think there will be a press release...

When I went to the first LISA meeting in 1996, launch was scheduled for about 2011; the Europeans are currently hoping for a 2016 launch, but the US is saying 2021 at the earliest. If the latter is the case, the launch date has slipped by 10 years in the last 10 years. That is not good.

Let me qualify: the LISA mission is in the Beyond Einstein line of missions, with currently three mission concepts LISA, JDEM and Con-X competing for two nominal launch slots in 2016 and 2021 (that is with current funding ramp profile, and I believe the dates are public info since they were mentioned openly in a well attended but poorly advertised open meeting...)

I am assuming LISA's expected launch date is the BE#2 launch slot in 2021, which may be incorrect. ESA clearly expects LISA to be launched in 2016 per their agreement with NASA and that it will be ready to launch then - which I think it likely will be based on what I have seen in the last 4 years.

Thats annoying. I want evidence fonfirming gravity waves as soon as possible. Or, even more fun, if they canot confirm them, that will be really interesting.