Pelosi Speaks

This would be funny, but...

Congress questions VP Office claim to not be an entity within the executive branch

"I question both the legality and wisdom of your actions. ... [I]t would appear particularly irresponsible to give an office with your history of security breaches an exemption from the safeguards that apply to all other executive branch officials."

An elegant solution does present it self: if the VP's office is not within the executive branch, then it presumably should not receive any funding that Congress has designated for the function of the executive branch.

This might leave the VP's office somewhat sparsely populated for a while, but I am sure they can negotiate a new budget, commensurate with their status, needs and historical record, subject to the usual restraints and oversight, of course.
Shouldn't take more than 12-18 months to figure the details out.

h/t atrios

Tags

More like this

What if some phylogenies were simply irresolvable? That is, what if, no matter how much data we collected, it would be impossible to reconstruct, with a high level of certainty, an accurate representation of the tree of life? That would suck. A lot.
There are 12 new articles in PLoS ONE today.
The image below is a phylogram, illustrating the degree of variation in a sequence of mitochondrial DNA.
So we were chatting, over coffee, as one does, and we were talking about the nuisance it is when you have Monte Carlo simulations with qualitatively different output branches, and how you can trace outcomes and divergent branches leading to different, and same, outcomes.

What is the odds on a full blown constitutional crisis before the end of the current administration? I would certainly give 7/5....

By Brad Holden (not verified) on 21 Jun 2007 #permalink