Extreme Solar Systems VII - extreme habitability

Extreme Solar Systems conference has finished, and the lovely WiFi service at Athens airport just crashed and wiped out what I wrote... aargh.

Hrmph, the previous version was much snappier and comprehensive, with amusing and informative hyperlinks.

Ok, before my battery runs out, here goes...

Lots of new instruments coming online.
Some new dedicated or semi-dedicated planet hunting telescopes.
Good prospects for near future space missions.

Shortage of time for followups. we're probably missing stuff because of slow followup and poor cadence on good targets, this will get much worse as discovery pace accelerates and we find "harder to observe systems".

Shortage of telescope time, money and people. Need more observations, analysis and theory.

Highlight of final day: lots of planets around binaries, may be only a narrow range of binary star orbital parameters excludes planets (in the habitable zone) - good since most of stars are binary members.
Book on planets in binaries coming out - collection of reviews, ed Haghighipour

Some stuff on planet characterisation - not enough biomarker people at the meeting, most of the atmosphere stuff was on hot Jovians.

Good talks from Sasselov's group at Harvard. Especially Valencia on habitability of super Earths.
The first order models show gross characteristics going the right way to improve habitability prospects, in particular plate tectonics work better with higher mass - get a carbon cycle and atmospheric feedback on long time scales.
Personal speculation: mantle subduction goes the right way to moderate surface water on volatile rich planets - the "ocean worlds" may mostly self-regulate to be shallow.

Fogg (of terraforming fame) gave a good talk on terrestrial plent formation after jovian migration.
Mardling has an elegant mechanism for pumping eccentricity (and forcing "bloating") for hot Jovians - already see several eccentric and/or bloated - needs a low mass (~ few Earth) mass planet in low eccentricity orbit exterior to jovian - as predicted by our migration models. Yay.
Naive perturbation theory requires higher mass external perturbers, which are ruled out by observation.
So eccentric or bloated hot Jovians may be markers for low mass planets in low eccentricity orbits exterior to the jovian! Cool.

Near IR imaging search started (UoAz) for high mass wide orbit jovians around all nearby M dwarfs (within 6 pc).
Bit of a fishing expedition since they are mostly old and therefore likely not IR bright, but worth a try.

Good summary talk by Doug Lin.

Final session was open panel discussion on "extreme habitability".
I chaired it, so I don't have notes, but someone did take notes and should send them to me soon.

Quite lively, no one dared get speculative on biological issues, and I managed to keep us away from anthropism for the most part...

My sense is that the trend is that we think planetary systems are common, that terrestrial planets are ubiquitous, and that a lot of stars may have reasonable planets persist for a long time in regions where liquid water or other stable chemistry will persist.
If life, or intelligent life, is rare, it is probably not for lack of planetary platforms.

Can't say for sure yet, but the trend is there.

Bit of discussion on broader biomarkers - energetics, chirality, isotope anomalies.
Even dyson spheres and artifacts, including chemical artifacts. Good stuff.

Fun meeting, well timed and good crowd.

Tags

More like this

Planets in binaries and star clusters: session 7 of Extreme Solar Systems II planets around binaries? in clusters? crazy stuff... and we are live... Carter - from Kepler on transiting circumbinary planets Obviuous Star Wars quip Some eclipse timing variations in 3 eclipsing stellar binaries,…
Exoplanets Rising continues theoretical rumination, as we contemplate formation, migration, water delivery and evolution Johansen and Lissauer on oligarchic models before lunch. Then Mayer on collapse of Too Big Too Fail blobs before Chambers and Raymond return to rocks bashing into each other.…
Final session of ExSSII on Earths, Super-Earths and Habitability liveblogging: Dimitar Sasselov - high density exoplanets HAT-P-20b - 14 gm/cc - hot 7 M_J giant planet, no prob modeling as degenerate H/He core Kepler-10b - 9 gm/cc - rocky Earth's central density 13 gm/cc Super-Earths expected…
Dave Charbonneau: why transits are cool Kicking off afternoon session is Josh Winn on transit uses and abuses. Then Gaspar Bakos on ground based transits. you get masses, and planetary radii. Can go to low masses and close in planets, and working to earth masses in habitable zone - Real Soon Now…

How do they define 'wide Jovians'?

A lot of papers with similar fishing expeditions I've seen end up saying things like "and we can rule out the existence of a 3 M_j planet at 40 AU": it's not like that's surprising.

Hopefully this one will be more fruitful.

Scott, I didn't really get the question. Do pardon me if I've gotten it wrong but wide Jovians are Jupiter sized planets in wide orbits. The definition to "wide" I supposed is a bit subjective and up to one's interpretation. It can be something out at 50 AU or it can more or maybe even less. I guess it is the same with the term "free floating planets". I know of at least one astronomer i.e. Dr J.D. Kirkpatrick who has strong objections to calling freely floating planet sized objects not in orbit around any central lighted fusor (in Prof Gibor Basri's definition implies any object capable of some fusion for even a short time e.g. BDs right up to hydrogen burners and "dead" stars like WDs, neutron and quark stars, etc. Dr Kirkpatrick thinks that whoever who coined the term "free floating planets" are just out to seek publicity. To each his/her own.

Sorry that last comment should have been addressed to ic348 instead. Ooopsie! Apologies.

This IR imaging survey for Jupiters around M dwarfs is what captures my attention. I guess we can more or less(?), once and for all(?), rule in or rule out Kamp's 2 Jovians around Barnard's Star. And perhaps also produce concrete evidence for or against Gatewood's Jovians around Lalande 21185. Not to forget the 0.7 MJup Jupiter or BD purportedly detected or seen by some around Proxima Centauri during the late 90s.

Well, for me it's really well after Sep 10 before doing anything drastic, since I'm deep in the tenure/promotion review process now ... not a good time to be picking a new ship to sail upon.

These posts have been a lot of fun to read, though. Lot of excitement in this field. Data rules.