that was a rough committee meeting...
those climates scientists sure don't take criticism lightly...
never argue about money with a physicist
shouldn't blog snarky things about NASA...
now you know how Colbert broke his wrist...
er, I mean, you should have seen that other guy tree.
it is firewood, now, I'm telling you
Interestingly, Mac photobooth is better than a mirror for putting bandages on oneself
- Log in to post comments
More like this
Zuska blasted some moron at SciAm for referring to our own Shelley Batts as "attractive" during his summary of Shelley's recent run in with the lawyers at Wiley over the reproduction of a research figure:
Excuse me? "Seems to be attractive"? WTF???
I mean, what the f*ck does that have to do with…
Back at the end of November, Martin wrote a post on the ethics of overpopulation, in which he offered these assertions:
It is unethical for anyone to produce more than two children. (Adoption of orphans, on the other hand, is highly commendable.)
It is unethical to limit the availability of…
(It's worth noting, however, that this may also be useful advice for interactions with others offline.)
I don't know what's in your heart. I don't know what's in your mind. I don't have direct access to either of those (because I'm a distinct person from you), and if I did, you'd probably feel…
So I see this link from Arts & Letters Daily which says physicists shouldn't be meta-physical and should be strictly Popperian instead. And it seems so very quaint and old-fashioned and grandfatherly, and all I can think is that, as Abraham Simpson once waxed poetic about when trying to…
Seriously, dude. What have I told you about calling bikers at the Quaker Steak n' Lube wussies?
Just look at the batmobile and ponder its 1960's greatness.
If you had only learned how to defend yourself against someone armed with a piece of fresh fruit...