Executive Privilege

Apparently Karl Rove just told a Congressional subcommittee that he would not bother to show up to an oversight hearing, despite a subpoena.

In justification his lawyer cited a letter allegedly sent by the President's lawyer, to Karl Rove, telling him not to appear, claiming Executive Privilege.

Chairwoman Linda Sanchez issued a six page ruling (pdf)

It is a thing of beauty, rather nice crisp point by point refutation of the assertion by Rove and his lawyer.

Stern letter, well written, are nice.

Now what?

...

Personally I'm pondering whether Congress will keep surrendering power to the Executive until Article 1 Section 6 is breached.
At that point it will be too late, of course.

Tags

More like this

This is a follow-up to my href="http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2007/07/this_is_what_they_are_hiding_1.php">post from yesterday: I'm not sure what "GOP fingerprints..." are, but I gather it was important to avoid them. href="http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/images/voter-caging…
The NY Times reports on another NSA lawsuit, this one from the Center for Constitutional Rights, that went to court in Manhattan yesterday. The judge in this case seems to be taking a more careful approach than Judge Taylor in the previous case, but a lot of what went on yesterday is fascinating.…
President Bush did do a signing statement on HR 5631 - the 2007 defence appropriations bill Part of the President's Signing Statement: "Sections 8007, 8084, and 9005 of the Act prohibit the use of funds to initiate a special access program or a new start program, unless the congressional defense…
The Senate Judiciary Committee has begun holding hearings on the issue of presidential signing statements. PSS are statements that the President signs along with a piece of legislation that gives his interpretation of certain provisions of the act. Such statements are not new, but Bush has used…

What are the penalties for contempt of congress?

The letter does a nice job of demolishing any arguments put forth by Rove that he has an immunity whatsoever. In fact by his refusal to testify under shaky legal theory he pretty much admits that he knows something but isn't going to tell anyone.

I say congress should appoint the Sergeant at Arms to do his duty and go and carry Rove before them.

It would be nice if they nailed his hide to a wall. That said, I think that the system will have to be gamed until November.

Having Rove get a pardon after telling Congress to subpeaona itself would be counterproductive.

By Brad Holden (not verified) on 10 Jul 2008 #permalink