What the next President must know

The Apple Pro-Sessions Science Blogging panel is done, and jolly good fun it was too.

Good crowd, very good questions and decent banter - interesting to meet the various sciblings, including the ringers in the crowd.

The last question, and I paraphrase, was interesting:
"What one thing should the next President understand about science?"

There were several good answers, mine was:

"The next President must understand that you CAN NOT make your own reality"

here is the original:

"The aide said that guys like me were ''in what we call the reality-based community,'' which he defined as people who ''believe that solutions emerge from your judicious study of discernible reality.'' I nodded and murmured something about enlightenment principles and empiricism. He cut me off. ''That's not the way the world really works anymore,'' he continued. ''We're an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you're studying that reality -- judiciously, as you will -- we'll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that's how things will sort out. We're history's actors . . . and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do.'""

Very existential, but you can't actually do that.
Doesn't work.

Tags

More like this

A recent Harris Poll found that 50% of Americans polled now say Iraq had weapons of mass destruction when it was invaded (up from 36% in 2005) and 64% say Saddam had "strong links" with al Qaeda. In other news, huge numbers of Americans have no "strong links" with reality. And the administration…
You really have to have a look at this column, from David Limbaugh, posted at Town Hall. It is simply not to be believed. The title: Leftist Thought Control. I'd respond to Limbuagh's arguments but for the fact that he doesn't provide any. Instead he simply makes assertion after assertion about…
Researchers Hope Obama Team Will Reinvigorate Role of Science Adviser: In recent years, though, some critics have charged that the science adviser's influence has reached another low under President George W. Bush.... "Some critics"? Like, the entire scientific community? The entire science…
I've never heard of Alex Beam before, which is a good thing — he seems to be some kind of journalist at the Boston Globe, and that's about all I know about him, other than that he seems to be an oblivious idiot. He has a column up in which he rages about the phrase "knowledge-based", apparently…