yet more on NASA conference funding

NASA is putting together a memo giving guidance on conference funding and travel under the 2009 fiscal year budget.
University scientists may be allowed to travel on NASA funds, when all is clear.

This is from SARA:

"The good news is that that folks who have grants (i.e., those at universities) and post-doctoral fellows and other student fellowships will almost certainly be exempt. "

We can hope, since the intent of the law would seem to be such.
The letter of the law is unclear on this, to my non-lawyer reading, and could well be interpreted to cap conference travel on NASA funds by scientists who have NASA grants. Certainly some grant officers are asking people to at least get permission before spending any '09 funds on conference travel.

What is very clear, is that NASA will not sponsor any conference in whole or part in '09. What funding they are permitted to spend will go on civil servant travel to meetings, and that will be much reduced. As written, the rationalization needed and paperwork associated with any NASA funding of conference travel is such that is it effectively impossible to get the proposal through. I doubt any program manager will try unless it is a time critical conference.
Oh, and no call for conference support in ROSES '09 round, given declared Congressional intent.

Civil servant conference travel is clearly capped at a level that is less than 1/3 of '08 level of attendance.
It is possible, but unclear, that the restriction covers indirect NASA employees like JPL and APL staff, and possibly also STSCI and IPAC and SAO etc.
Ouch.

We'll get definitive guidance eventually. In the meantime travel will probably be overcut and some excess fund floating around in late summer '09.

No word from AAS on this, don't know if it is below their radar or they are holding their breath and hoping it will all work out ok.
AAS meeting in january could be badly impacted.

Tags

More like this

More news on the NASA conference ban for 2009, and the possible impacts. The source of the conference amendment (sec 1121 of HR 6063) is Sen Coburn, apparently, as noted in comments in the previous post. NASAwatch links to the NASA memos on this policy Two things are unambiguous: NASA direct…
A literal reading of the NASA Authorization Act implies a significant cutback of astronomy conferences in 2009. Warning e-mail, pending clarification, has gone out, and people have already done some canceling of planned travel. Something bad snuck into the H.R. 6063 NASA Authorization Act (2008) […
The proposed economic stimulus package includes some funding for science. Chunk for NSF, lot of facility funding. NASA gets climate science. DoE gets some toys. Appropriations Stimulus 0115 (pdf) The total package is somewhere in the $800+ billion range, as proposed. With about 1/3 proposed as tax…
Over at io9, they have a post on the finances of running a research lab at a major university. It's reasonably good as such things go, but very specific to the top level of research universities. As I am not at such an institution, I thought it might be worthwhile to post something about the…

What we heard earlier this week from an HQ person was that anyone on a grant or contract is not limited unless the contract specifically directs them to travel. Civil servants are being limited to one conference in '09. Meetings such as science working groups and peer reviews do not count as conferences. SMD has been allocated 1.25 million of the conference cap. NASA is reneging on conference sponsorship commitments.

"anyone on a grant or contract is not limited unless the contract specifically directs them to travel"

perverse, but actually consistent with the law as I read it - you may only travel if the grant did not specify that you must travel... logically one would expect the other way around, but this is Congress

any word on whether the SMD cap only applies to staff inside the fence, or does it also apply to JPL/APL/STSCI/SAO etc?