Virginia County Circuit Judge Peatross set aside a subpoena by Cuccinelli, Virginia's Attorney General, seeking the record of Prof. Michael Mann while he worked at the University of Virginia.
The ruling said the AG had failed state what was suspected to be false or fraudulent, but leaves the option for Cuccinelli to refile a new supoena.
UVa likes
Cuccinelli apperntly intends to refile the subpoena as soon as he can think of something suitable fishy to randomly allege.
h/t kos
NYT story
WaPo story
- Log in to post comments
More like this
The sorry saga continues...
WASHINGTON (October 21, 2010) - Yesterday, the University of Virginia made two court filings in its fight against Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli's politically motivated investigation of climate scientist Michael Mann.
In its most strongly-worded court filing to…
Do something, Virginia. Your attorney general, Ken Cuccinelli, is on an absurd crusade against Michael Mann and the University of Virginia. His previous attempt to defame Mann with accusations of fraud was recently shot down in the courts, but now he has thrown another pile of accusations at him,…
The American Tradition Institute a.k.a. ATI a.k.a. Energy & Environmental Legal Institute is a "think" tank that supports or engages in climate science denialism. You can read about it here and here. Michael Mann is a climate scientist, famous for bringing to the world's attention the alarming…
For those who haven't heard rightwing extremist Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli has subpoenaed all of the documents related to climatologist Michael Mann's state-funded research while Mann was at the University of Virginia (italics mine):
In papers sent to UVA April 23, Cuccinelli's…
Cuccinelli has no idea what's supposed to be false or fraudulent - he's just convinced there must be something false or fraudulent because the results of Mann's research contradict elements of Cuccinelli's worldview. The judge should have just not bothered with the subpoena and rejected it on technical grounds: "Invalid due to being signed by Ken Cuccinelli, please resubmit signed by an adult."
The judge should have just not bothered with the subpoena and rejected it on technical grounds: "Invalid due to being signed by Ken Cuccinelli, please resubmit signed by an adult."
I understand the appeal of that position, but I don't think it was legally available. Cuccinelli is AG, so the law presumes that he is an adult. I'm sure that Cuccinelli will find something "suspected to be false or fraudulent," most likely with outside help (one or more of the usual denialist suspects). The judge did limit the investigation to money originating from the State of Virginia, i.e., Mann's federal grants are out of bounds under the statute Cuccinelli wants to invoke.
The deeper assumption here is that VA state's attorney actually KNOWS some science in order to refile.