The class I'm teaching right now is "writing intensive" - so the homework is biased towards short essays and written discourse.
One of my standard assignments is to have the students pick a NASA mission: a past mission, and a current mission, and a future mission, and write a summary of the mission plan and/or accomplishments.
So, what do I do now?
Ask them to pick a planned future mission that has now been cancelled and write what it might have done if flown?
- Log in to post comments
More like this
This year I noted an anomaly in one of my class assignments...
In my class, that just finished, as part of some of the short writing assignments, I ask the students to look at past, current and future space science missions, NASA or ESA, and to describe one of each to me : 1-2 pages at a level…
I'm not quite done with this semester, but I'm also starting to think about the courses that I'm teaching in the winter. In particular, I'm thinking about our department writing course. The course is in transition right now - in the past, it's been a writing-in-the-discipline course, but because of…
"For I dipped into the Future,
far as human eye could see;
saw the vision of the world,
and all the wonder that would be." -Alfred, Lord Tennyson
This weekend, the Sun is shining here in Portland, as we've gotten our first annual spell of warm, sunny days recently. It's got me thinking of the…
As I've said a bazillion times already this term, I'm teaching a class that is about research and writing, with a big final paper due at the end of the term. Because iterative feedback is key to learning to write, they also have to turn in a complete rough draft, which I will mark up and have them…
Simple. For a future mission, they can either write about JWST *or* they can write about anything else. Can't have both together. You get one, or a lot of the others.
JWST, with it's truly scary new life cycle cost, is not only strangling NASA astrophysics, but is going to end up hurting other NASA disciplines (planetary, earth, helio, technology, human space flight, and maybe even aero) as well. So when JWST is launched, we move on to all those other great astronomy missions we had to postpone, right? Nope. That's when we'll move on to paying back all the other disciplines, who will look to astrophysics to meet their own cost overruns.
Think of it as astrophysics with a mortgage. Just keep on payin'.
I hope your students think about our current quandry with JWST, and the world it may leave them with. Scientifically richer, but fiscally and opportunistically much poorer.
JWST represents awesome science, for sure. But you can save JWST, or you can save space astrophysics. Take your pick.
Steinn, you could ask them to write about past & present NASA missions & future ESA missions!?
"Henry" said ....
"astrophysics with a mortgage". What an excellent slogan! Just imagine the T-shirt possibilities.