Directory of open access journals

Apropos of our discussion yesterday of the pros and cons of open access publishing, I'd like to point you to a great resource: the Directory of Open Access Journals.

The Directory of Open Access Journals ... covers free, full text, quality controlled scientific and scholarly journals. We aim to cover all subjects and languages. There are now 2417 journals in the directory. Currently 709 journals are searchable at article level. As of today 118146 articles are included in the DOAJ service.

The psychology section lists 56 journals, though some of our favorite open access journals such as the Journal of Vision are listed elsewhere (in this case, under medicine -- opthamology). It might be better if it was possible to list resources under more than one heading.


More like this

Liz Allen posted this on the Wall of the PLoS Facebook group yesterday: Here's a fun Friday activity for all of you who like to track the stats of the inevitable rise and world domination of OA! Heather from SPARC turned me onto this. it's almost as much fun as watching the number of members to…
Need to analyze your DNA, protein or Gene (or do a one of a gadzillion other bioinformatic operations?) Well fortunately you live in the internet age. But where to start? From the Nucleic Acids Research Journal: A compilation of molecular biology web servers: 2006 update on the Bioinformatics Links…
I'm always interested in the present and future of libraries and higher education. There's a steady stream of reports from various organizations that are broadly relevant to the (mostly academic) library biz but they can be tough to keep track of. I thought I'd aggregate some of those here. Of…
It seems that the American Association for the Advancement of Science has just announced the new publisher of it's flagship family of Science journals: AAAS CEO Alan I. Leshner today announced the appointment of Kent Anderson, a past president of the Society for Scholarly Publishing (SPP), to serve…

Speaking of open access journals:

"If you've made up your mind to test a theory, or you want to explain some idea, you should always decide to publish it whichever way it comes out. If we only publish results of a certain kind, we can make the argument look good. We must publish BOTH kinds of results." -- Richard Feynman's essay on Cargo Cult Science [1][2]

1. Journal of Articles in Support of the Null Hypothesis
2. "Journal of Negative Results in Biomedicine "
3. "Journal of Negative Results - Ecology and Evolutionary Biology"

See also this review which critiques the few negative results which have been published in major journals [3]. They usually don't include enough information to be useful!


By Brian Mingus (not verified) on 18 Oct 2006 #permalink