Ask a ScienceBlogger about...movies?

We were asked to identify a film that did something positive for
science.  I was not able to come up with anything, not being
much of a film aficionado.  So I asked one of my contacts for
ideas.



My contact suggested the film, href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0118884/">Contact,
with , based on a book by href="http://imdb.com/name/nm0755981/" rel="tag">Carl
Sagan.  



Ms. Foster portrayed a scientist, Dr. Ellie Arroway.  She
comes across as a regular scientist, not a token female; she is a
scientist who happens to be a woman.  Plus, it deals with the
old science vs. religion theme, something that ScienceBloggers have
been known to take an interest in.



From the IMDb:


The film of course centers around the science vs.
religion theme, the oldest and most frightening of all school debates.



I suppose now that I have posted this, I will have to see the movie...


More like this

Did we miss an opportunity over the last few months? For several months, since Last April, SETI has been in hibernation, not taking calls from aliens living in other worlds with radio sets. Phil Plait reports that SETI is back on line after a revival of funding. The question is, did we miss any…
The Seed Magazine motto is "Science as Culture." Interesting. I think they are talking about the interaction of culture and science, and about science as a part of the broader culture. But it may also be true that science, or scientists in particular, form something of a subculture (not a…
[Below is a longer, less edited version of an article I wrote for my department newsletter this month.] Is science blogging something that belongs to Science or to Journalism? Clearly more and more scientists are communicating online. In a time when mainstream media are obliterating their science…
(NOTE ADDED 12/7/2010: Kim Tinkham has died of what was almost certainly metastatic breast cancer.) Three days ago, I decided to take a look at the scientific literature regarding whether any "alternative" therapies do any good for breast cancer. Not surprisingly, I found no evidence that any such…

You will likely be disappointed.
I don't know what Carl Sagan may have been trying to say, but the movie said very little to me about anything particularly important.

It wasn't very science-y. It was an okay movie, but on the science side... I don't remember it getting into being pro-science.

Shitty movie. Good book. Just read the book.

By Evil Monkey (not verified) on 06 Aug 2006 #permalink

2001 anyone? Everything in it was pretty much doable in principle when it was made. Just never happened. (HAL is taking a little longer than expected, but is the nearest to realization so far). Contact needed exotic tech just to get off the ground. 2001 just needed it at the end.

I think GATTACA was pretty good, if you accept the premise that only body flotsam the size of an eyelash or nail clipping contains enough DNA to identify an individual.