Speech Recognition with no Speech

href="http://www.nasa.gov/centers/ames/news/releases/2004/subvocal/subvocal.html">i-e975b4df685252d8e6d61e27c07b9c47-78112main_ACD04-0024-001.jpgNASA
is working on a href="http://www.nasa.gov/centers/ames/news/releases/2004/subvocal/subvocal.html">new
type of speech recognition.  Rather
than analyzing sounds, it detects nerve impulses in the throat.
 The user does not have to speak out loud.
 Instead, the user merely thinks about speaking, much as one
does when reading silently.  







This sounds pretty neat, although the accuracy is not very good yet.
 I could imagine this being used for things like cursor
control, or any number of other things, if the accuracy can be improved.


More like this

This is not a traditional review, in that I am not going to discuss the distro in any systematic or comprehensive fashion.  There already are several reviews out there in the href="http://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=suse">usual places.  Rather, I am going to outline my experiences…
University of Washington researchers have developed a vocal mouse that moves the cursor around the screen with clicks and phonemes: The Internet offers wide appeal to people with disabilities. But many of those same people find it frustrating or impossible to use a handheld mouse. Software…
It's been a while since I did any ResearchBlogging, first because I was trying to get some papers of my own written, and then because I was frantically preparing for my classes this term (which start Wednesday). I've piled up a number of articles worth writing up in that time, including two papers…
When I came home from work, and saw the headline: DeVos Backs Discussion of Intelligent Design, I knew I wanted to blog it.  Alas, I get the afternoon paper.   href="http://scienceblogs.com/dispatches/2006/09/devos_and_intelligent_design.php#more">Ed Brayton gets the href="http://www.freep.…

It's only neat to the extent that technology, and Frankenstein's monster, are neat. It's real neat to the extent that it benefits particular human beings. It's not neat if its user's power over their physical environment exceeds their sense, or their senses. What will be the psychological consequences, on the users of this technology, of the ability to manipulate their environments, if they lack the ability to experience a natural environment? Is there a spiritual benefit to this technology? Gee whiz.

Of course there is a spiritual benefit. Salman can scribe the mutterings of the great prophet Mahound much faster using this device. Of course, this is feasible only because, for that paticular application, accuracy does not matter.