Rove's Math

I know too much schadenfreude isn't good for you, but I just couldn't resist posting this little excerpt of Rovian braggadocio from NPR last week:

SIEGEL: We're in the home stretch, though, and many would consider you on the optimistic end of realism about -
ROVE: Not that you would be exhibiting a bias ...
SIEGEL: I'm looking at all the same polls that you're looking at every day.
ROVE: No, you're not. No, you're not.
SIEGEL: No, I'm not.
ROVE: No, you're not. You're not. I'm looking at 68 polls a week. You may be looking at four or five public polls a week that talk about attitudes nationally but that do not impact the outcome of -
SIEGEL: I'm looking at main races between - certainly Senate races.
ROVE: Well, like the poll today showing that Corker's ahead in Tennessee, or the poll showing that Allen is pulling away in the Virginia Senate race.
SIEGEL: Leading Webb in Virginia, yeah.
Mr. ROVE: Exactly.
SIEGEL: But you've seen the DeWine race and the Santorum race - I don't want to have you call races.
ROVE: Yeah, I'm looking at all these, Robert, and adding them up, and I add up to a Republican Senate and Republican House. You may end up with a different math, but you're entitled to your math, I'm entitled to THE math.
SIEGEL: Well, I don't know if we're entitled to our different math, but you're certainly
ROVE: I said THE math. I said you're entitled to yours.

Maybe it's time to buy Karl a new calculator.

Tags

More like this

Yesterday, Karl Rove was interviewed by Robert Siegel on NPR. I just about passed out from shock when I heard the following exchange: (transcript via [raw story](http://www.rawstory.com/news/2006/Rove_dukes_it_out_with_NPR_1025.html)) >MR. SIEGEL: We're in the home stretch, though. And many…
Random thoughts below the fold. John Sweeney, R-NY, has lost. Hitting your wife isn't liked by the electorate. I wasn't a huge Jim Webb fan, but he was vastly superior to Sen. George "Macacawitz" Allen. Once again, it looks like the asshole Green Party siphoned off just enough votes to give the…
There was some buzz Thursday about a poll showing that 40% of white people don't have any friends of a different race. Ipsos/Reuters include a spiffy "data explorer" where you can make graphs like the one above. It does not appear to provide an easy way to get at the actual wording of the question…
I'll be jotting notes here. Feel free to jot notes in the comments. Bernie Sanders re-elected 6:22 PM Central: Virginia reporting good numbers for Obama. Larger turnouts than 2008 in VA. 6:54 PM Central: Senate: 30 DEM seats called, 37 GOP seats. Leaving the polling place today, there was a…

Can we ship him a copy of "Arithmetic for Dummies"?

Do you remember all that Republican BS critiquing the Clinton White House for being too poll-driven?

Yeah Rove, you may have THE numbers, but the DEMS had YOUR number.

By Christopher (not verified) on 09 Nov 2006 #permalink

Well, maybe Rove's polls had some sort of internal flaw.

I know that whenever I was called and asked how I was going to vote, I always assured the Republicans I was going to vote for them. But, somehow, on election day, I didn't. :-)

I'm really worried this is gonna be like 1992 all over again, a 2 year wonder then reality hits again. Only this time there's no Clinton in the White House to hold the pubbies down.

Rove sings a different tune

...
And he does not believe his data let him down. "My job is not to be a prognosticator," he said. "My job is not to go out there and wring my hands and say, 'We're going to lose.' I'm looking at the data and seeing if I can figure out, Where can we be? I told the President, 'I don't know where this is going to end up. But I see our way clear to Republican control.' "
...

I hope numerous people will save the transcript and recording of Siegel's interview, and play it back for Rove at every opportunity for decades to come. Smug git.

By Mustafa Mond, FCD (not verified) on 11 Nov 2006 #permalink