The Daily Show on Psychology

Jon Stewart, interviewing Tal Ben-Shahar, who teaches a positive psychology class at Harvard:

"I was a psychology major, so I know a lot of it is bullshit."

Watch the video here.

Tags

More like this

Okay, Jonah saw this first -- but in case you missed it there, here's a snip from Jon Stewart interviewing Oliver Sacks about music and the brain. This is a nice meeting. I've not met Stewart, but I had the pleasure to spend some time with Sacks while working on a couple stories, and he once gave…
[originally posted December 9, 2005] A few months ago, Jon Stewart opened the eyes of his Daily Show audience when he interviewed the author of the book On Bullshit. Viewers accustomed to hearing the familiar bleep when Stewart enters foul-mouth mode were surprised to find that the word came…
A few months ago, Jon Stewart opened the eyes of his Daily Show audience when he interviewed the author of the book On Bullshit. Viewers accustomed to hearing the familiar bleep when Stewart enters foul-mouth mode were surprised to find that the word came through completely uncensored. Stewart…
I'm here in DC at the Newseum for the State of Innovation Summit, a collaboration between SEED and the Council on Competitiveness. The crowd is pretty awesome - right now Adam Bly, SEED's CEO, is sitting a few rows from me with E.O. Wilson. Earlier, Wayne Clough, Secretary of the Smithsonian…

I was just surprised that Jon Stewart was a psych major. I'm not eager to weigh in on the "bullshit" question.

aaaah. Well obviously, not ALL of psychology is BS... Maybe Stewart picked his major based on what classes the pretty girls were taking. Certainly psychology is less depressing than, say, PoliSci.

I would note that many people, like Stewart in the segment, seem to believe that branches of psychology are BS because they aren't inherently reductionist. I think that's mistaken. Lots of uber-reductionist neuroscience is BS (ie, it's utterly wrong and will be disproved in 5 years) but I think many of the core tenets of social psychology, for example, have aged very well. Just look at cognitive dissonance. That's a fifty year old theory that is still as relevant and applicable as ever. So if it's BS, then it's BS that has stood the test of time.

There is not that much point in getting worked up over an entertainer, who wasn't even totally dismissive. Psychology is just more bullshit-tolerant than other sciences. Objectivity is difficult and sometimes undesired when your subject is you. Psychological theories do not have the benefit of mathematically defined concepts like physics and chemistry. And unlike biology, the model system is a black box. And unlike all 3, its parameters are sensitive to social bias. In order to tell what is bullshit and what is not in psychology you have to be very critical and vigilant, things people are often not wont to be. And Jonah's right, an important feature of a good theory is if the resultant airplane will fly, and certainly there are many examples from psychology.

By caribbeanwaffle (not verified) on 14 Aug 2007 #permalink