Human Growth Hormone

Food for thought, thanks for the post, but at what age should or could HGH be taken? If the pros are doing it, then college kids will, and what about high school use?

If it could be prescribed legally, that would be good, in that it would take it out of the hands of a Balco, or cheap importers.

I'm thinking we need more studies on this.

I am a physician who works in Emergency Departments and I have never seen a study saying HGH helps heal an injury. Does anyone know of any?

Interstingly, hGH appears to be one of the few drugs where off-label use is illegal even with a doctor's prescription.

In most cases, it's perfectly legal for an MD to prescribe an approved drug for an unapproved use. However, there is a section of the US Code (21USC333(e)) that specifically prohibits that for hGH.

From the (insane) US Code linked by getzal:
(e) Prohibited distribution of human growth hormone

(1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), whoever knowingly distributes, or possesses with intent to distribute, human growth hormone for any use in humans other than the treatment of a disease or other recognized medical condition, where such use has been authorized by the Secretary of Health and Human Services under section 355 of this title and pursuant to the order of a physician, is guilty of an offense punishable by not more than 5 years in prison, such fines as are authorized by title 18, or both.

Wow! quetzal and Kelly's observations are genuinely informative, but stimulate the question, "Why, of all the drugs out there that a physician is entitled to prescribe for off-label use, has hGH been singled out for this restriction. (I am learning and perhaps it is not the only drug so singled out, but I was always under the impression that any approved drug or even unapproved drug could be prescribed by a licensed physician.) In any case, reflecting on the baseball debacle, the Gladwell blog informs that it is not an anabolic steroid and baseball had not forbidden its use at the time that many of the accused in the Mitchell report made use of hGH. So now I find that a number of years ago when I had some unused Vicodin tablets and a friend who had a recent surgery was in pain, I was illegal to give him several. I am by nature anti-prosecutorial, and in that mode find the Mitchell Report a gross misuse of media power in the way it lumped some eighty-odd ball players together as culpable misusers. I trust that the good Senator was never in the position that I was regarding Vicodin tablets . . . .

If athletes want to risk the minor side-effects of temporary HGH use in order to recover from an injury, then that's fine with me. I realize baseball has to guard against a slippery slope, but it's also important to realize that not all hormones are equivalent. My analogy for HGH is injected painkillers, which have really changed the game of football. Players can now play through injuries that used to put them on the sidelines. Is that a bad thing?

You are right on the mark with this post! I have been on science blogs from all over the world and a hot topic right now is the moral and ethical dilemma posed by cognition enhancing drugs. The discussion has even gotten to the point where we are into the qualitative and quantitative stage of discussing is coffee OK and if so, is too much not OK?
I think we need to get used to these kids of topics because the entire 21st century is going to full of them.
Dave Briggs :~)

So, as a more or less beginning blogger, I offered up an opinion about hGH and the baseball "scandal" and the Mitchell Report. Then I dug a little deeper. Mitchell says that estimates of use of "performance enhancing drugs" (in which class he places hGH without clinical evidence insofar as I can see) in baseball varied from as high as 50% to 30% or somewhat less. But you get the drift that 20% would not be an unlikely low ball estimate even in his mind. And this was for a time period in excess of twenty years! Then the good Senator comes forward and names about eighty individuals as "users" lumping the hGH users with the users of anabolic steroids and Lord knows what else he regarded as "performance enhancing." Some of these individuals, he goes on to report, received prescriptions from licensed but inferentially disreputable physicians who in SOME cases never even examined the player to whom the substances were eventually delivered. Wait a minute . . . some of these guys may have actually had prescriptions for these substances dated from a time before these drugs were banned by baseball and they are still being named??

So we now have the names of some minor percentage players over the last 20-25 years who were given up by individuals under prosecution who are trying to improve their lot. This gives the news-hungry sport writers the license to sanctimoniously call for barricading the doors to Cooperstown. Those same individuals will laud some middle linebacker as a"gamer" when he plays this weekend shot up with painkillers and who knows what else. The entire scenario is pitiful.

Pardon me, but I have to get back to my reading. Almost finished with Kerouac's "On the Road" and intend to read a little Hunter Thompson after that.

By the way, I just found an article in the Daily Standard by a writer named Dean Barrett. Mr Barrett posted a story today in which he observes "George Mitchell could have produced a fair report, but the results wouldn't have been as satisfying or sensational . . . . Senator Mitchell should be ashamed and embarrassed about his work product." Bravo, Mr. Barrett. Maybe the drug Mitchell is addicted to is non-prescription and known as limelight.

This whole thing always remindes me of this 2004 article from Outside magazine in which a writer and amateur cyclist decides -- in response to doping scandals in cycling -- to go down that path and see just what the rewards are.

So now with Pakistan teetering, Iraq continuing as highly problematic at best, recession looming, and Britney Spears losing custody, our Congress wants to hear from Roger, Andy and the alleged hGH administering crew about stuff that happened years ago. I am convinced that headlines are the most addictive and most destructive drug.

I am very much thankful for the information. In case of emergency even a small thing may do a big work and for . I completely agree with Dave Briggs. I know about a site where all hgh online products are placed.

I am a physician who works in Emergency Departments and I have never seen a study saying HGH helps heal an injury. Does anyone know of any? there are many studies

www.sporix.org

The search for the "21st century HGH" continues unabated and in fact more enterprisingly today, as various pills and potions promise to extend youth and heal the damage of age.

HGH spray can be very helpful for body building. They also have all other types of uses too. There can be some different side effects, so I'd be sure to consult a doctor before using it.

You made some great items there. I did so looking on the topic and discovered the majority of people concur with you actually. But it is human nature for some people to be able to differ. However , what ever. They're within the section.

Fun men and women rooting inside unwarranted depressive disorder, hypotension, vital sedation or sleep, or simply [i]lasix for fluid with lungs cats[/i] could possibly appitete in case a lot of these cals usually are withheldabandoned inside indicatedthe while using a number of genetic associated with oxycodone.

salut vous j'aime bien cet article mais l' immobilier est mon hobbie.