Why We Should Worry: "Sticks in the Mind: Alaska Oil Spill Project, 1989-2010"


Lingering 1989 Exxon Valdez oil in beach sediments in Prince William Sound, Alaska

I clearly remember the announcement of the oil spill from the Exxon Valdez in 1989. The event was so upsetting that I refused to purchase gas from Exxon for decades.

Now, twenty one years later, an exhibit by artist Carole Fisher opens today at the Minneapolis College of Art and Design demonstrates the environmental damage that remains, in 2010.

As politicians invoke "Drill, Baby, Drill," I question whether the ripple effects over generations have been considered.

According to the artist:

"Many years later, it is still obvious that the spill altered the face of Alaska in ways much more significant than the erasure of a beauty mark. The social, economic, and ecological impact has been catastrophic."

More like this

The news from the Gulf of Mexico oil spill is not good. If the NOAA estimates are right about the size of the spill it could dwarf Exxon Valdez: Over the last few days, estimates had held that the Gulf of Mexico oil spilling was leaking about 1,000 barrels, or 42,000 gallons, into the water each…
Dan Rather was the newscaster. His lead for the CBS Evening News on Friday, March 24, 1989 was: "An oil tanker ran aground today off the nation's northern most ice-free port, Valdez, Alaska." The Exxon vessel was holding 53 million gallons of crude oil. By 3:30 am, the Coast Guard estimated that 5.…
When a scientist is writing a scientific paper we look for that one quintessential figure that tells the whole story. Other figures are ancillary to fill in the specifics but the 'cardinal figure' is where all the meat of the paper is distilled to one remarkable graph. A senior scientist once told…
By Sheldon Krimsky ExxonMobil has already come under scrutiny for funding global warming deniers, but the company has also funded research that raises concerns about conflict of interest in litigation research. The company began funding litigation research after being hit with punitive damages for…

Yes, the US, Russia & Canada are going to suck the crude from the Arctic basin and Yes, there will be "accidents." The top of the world will become beslimed because not that many people live there and those who do are poor & don't tend to vote, or can be bought off, or.. Naw, we won't kill or displace them anymore. More like the MSM just won't cover Those peoples' "plight" much. Continued coverage of the Injun spats gets tedious, whether they're Afghanis, Iraqis or the Arctic Rim Injuns. You wouldn't want to be cold, would you? What would you do if you couldn't get to work? What would you rather do without: plastics or white bears? The Arctic's a long way off when you're hemorrhaging $20s at the pump, Jeff.

By darwinsdog (not verified) on 21 Jan 2011 #permalink