"At-home" burglaries

Jim De Arras said:

60% of all house burglaries in GB occur while the house is
occupied. Less than
10% here. More than 50% of homes here have firearms, less than 5% there.

I've proven that the mere existence without use of most guns in
homes in the USA makes even your gunless home safer to sleep in than
homes in GB.

Let's see: Your proof goes:

(1) Gun ownership is greater in the US than in GB.
(2) "At-home" burglaries are more common in GB than in the US.
Therefore:
(3) Gun ownership deters "at-home" burglary.

We also have:
(4) Gun ownership is greater in the US than in Canada.
(5) "At-home" burglaries are more common in the US (14%, NCS data)
than in Canada (10%, Canadian Urban Victimization Survey #9)
Therefore (by your reasoning)
(6) Gun ownership encourages "at-home" burglary.

I don't see how (3) and (6) can both be true. Perhaps there is
something wrong with your proof technique?

Tags

More like this

On pages 136-138 of "Point Blank" Kleck discusses Kennesaw burglaries. He states that after Kennesaw passed a (purely symbolic) law requiring a gun in every household, residential burglaries fell by 89%. His explanation for this decrease is that publicity about the law reminded
In an opinion piece in the New York Times Glenn Reynolds claims:
Frank Crary said: [Kennesaw] was a response to Morton Grove's gun ban. Guess which "worked" better? If by "worked" you mean that crime rates were lower after the relevant law than before, the answer is Morton Grove.