"At-home" burglaries

Mark Gibson writes:

And Waller and Okihiro (1978, p. 31) reported
that 44% of burglarized Toronto residences were occupied during the
burglaries, with 21% of the burglaries resulting in confrontations between
victim and offender.

Waller and Okihiro did not have enough money to conduct a full victim
survey of Toronto, so concentrated on some high crime areas. Their
results do not necessarily generalize to the whole city. A full
victim survey of Edmonton in 1987 found an at-home rate of 10%, which
is less than that for the US.

That would not explain why at-home burglary rates appear to be
inversely correlated with gun-ownership rates.

How on earth can you claim this, Mark? After all, you have dismissed
the NCVS (source of the at-home burglary rates) as flawed and the ICS
(source of the gun-ownership) rates as fraudulent.

Tags

More like this

Alternatively, a respondent making up a DGU, or describing a friend's DGU as if it happened to someone in the respondent's household will tend to make him or herself the defensive gun user. Joel Friedman writes: While I do not disagree, your estimate of 70% / 15% is just that an estimate. It is…
The percentage of at-home burglaries is higher in the US (14%) than it is in Canada (10%). If guns account for the difference it is because US burglars are more likely to be armed and feel that they can take on the residents. US data comes from the National Crime Survey 1979-87. In 14.7% of…
Jim De Arras said: Well, Mr. Lambert, lets have the numbers for .au, and see where the trend leads us. Here are all the numbers I have. Country % at-home % gun homicide burglaries ownership rate Netherlands 48 2 0.9 England 26-59 5 0.7…
On pages 136-138 of "Point Blank" Kleck discusses Kennesaw burglaries. He states that after Kennesaw passed a (purely symbolic) law requiring a gun in every household, residential burglaries fell by 89%. His explanation for this decrease is that publicity about the law reminded criminals of the…