Tom Spencer thinks that Reynolds is "making wild evidence-free claims about the nature of other scholarship in the field just to distract you from the trouble his man Lott is in." It is certainly odd that Reynolds doesn't provide any evidence that the research he criticizes is "utter bilge" while insisting that criticism of Lott is
"best done by those who ... have done actual work, and have actual evidence relevant to the matter at hand.
More like this
Glenn Reynolds wrongly claimed that I'd said that 59 was similar to 88.
I was mistaken when I suggested that the email Dooher sent Reynolds was a hoax.
Kevin Drum has a nice summary on Lott's anonymous attack on Levitt. Kieran Healy tells what Lott's next step will be.
Back in 2004, Glenn Reynolds declared that the election here in Australia was in no small part a referendum on the Iraq war. This was wrong, as anyone who was here at the time could tell you.