Lott has an update to his 6/13/03 post where he responds to this post. He writes:
An e-mailer asks about whether the Ayres and Donohue piece in the American Law and Economics Review was refereed. While the original papers in that journal are indeed refereed, their piece was a review article and my understanding from Ayres was that it was not refereed.
It seems that Lott is unable to admit to even the smallest error. He claimed that they had not published it in a refereed journal, when in fact they had. Instead of admitting to the error he pretends that his original claim was different.
More importantly, this very minor point has been the only response by Lott to my last two weeks of postings where I have raised some very important issues. When will Lott say something about the coding errors?
More like this
By way of Brad DeLong, I came across a post by Tyler Cowen that discusses 'fast track' article review:
On the last day of every golf tournament, Tiger Woods insists on wearing a bright red polo shirt. Woods says the habit is merely superstition, but new research suggests that his fashion sense might actually come with athletic benefits.
I said in the previous post that the time-resolved collision paper was one of my favorite experiences in grad scho
For a sportsman, sometimes pay to have the referee seeing red.