Kininmonth in the Age

Oh, great. After getting his bogus claims about climate models into the Australian, Kininmonth now has them in the Age:

The IPCC radiative forcing hypothesis ignores the atmospheric and ocean circulations that transport surplus solar energy from the tropics to polar regions. Nowhere are local temperatures due solely to radiation processes, a fact that goes to underscore the fallacy of the hypothesis.

It takes about two minutes with Google for anyone to find out that global climate models do include atmospheric and ocean circulations. What's disappointing about this is that back in November the Age had a story about Kininmonth in the Science section which had comments from scientists about Kininmonth's arguments were no good. But now he gets an article in the Business section. What is going on?

Tags

More like this

This column in the Australian from Frank Devine is mainly about how the latest Disney cartoon is "pernicious and propagandistic" and threatens our freedom, but he also includes some war-on-science stu
On his column in the Financial Review last week, John Quiggin wrote about those who think global warming is some sort of hoax:
The Lavoisier group is an Australian astroturf operation. John Quiggin observed that:
To mark the centenary of the publication of Einstein's famous equation, Spiked has surveyed

What's going on? Most likely - Kininmonth knows how to convince lazy newspaper reporters.

By Chris Jarrett (not verified) on 08 Jul 2005 #permalink

Its pretty scary the level of rubbish that gets published. Whats even scarier is to realise that a lot of people will believe it and will subsequently probably defend it as well-written truth. Argh!